Evaluation of Anesthesia Methods in Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress

Main Article Content

Sri Wahjoeningsih
Widowati Witjaksono

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section which was appropriate for the clinical situation. This retrospective study was conducted on 240 patients undergoing Caesarean section with indications of foetal distress during a 3-year period (2002-2004). The data were reviewed from the patient’s medical record of the Department of Anesthesiology, Dr Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya. The patients were divided into three groups, according to the criteria of foetal heart rates. The success of the anaesthesia methods was determined by assessing the Apgar scores of the newborn baby. The results were analyse using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square test. P ?0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 1- and 5-minute Apgar score of the normal range group was significantly higher than that of the bradycardia group (p<0.05), but no significant differences was found between the normal range and the tachycardia group (p>0.05). Oneand five- minute Apgar scores of the sub-arachnoid block group were significantly higher than those of the general anesthesia group (p<0.05). One-minute Apgar score of the ketamine group was significantly higher than that of the thiopental group (p<0.05), but no significant differences in 5-minute Apgar score was found between the ketamine and the thiopental groups (p>0.05). We conclude that subarachnoid block is the choice of anaesthesia for patients undergoing Caesarean section for foetal distress’s diagnosed at PS 1 and 2 patients. General anaesthesia with ketamine Apgar score at one minute better than that of the thiopental.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Sri Wahjoeningsih, Widowati Witjaksono. Evaluation of Anesthesia Methods in Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress. Malays J Med Sci [Internet]. 2007 Jul. 31 [cited 2026 Oct. 22];14(2):41-6. Available from: https://ejournal.usm.my/mjms/article/view/mjms_vol14-no2-2007_7
Section
Original Articles

References

Birnbach DJ, Gatt SP, Datta S. Anesthesia for Presumed Fetal Jeopardy; Textbooks of Obstetric Anesthesia. Philadelphia; Churchill Livingstone. 2000.

James, FM, Wheeler, AS. Obstetric Anesthesia. Philadelphia; The Complicated Patient.Philadelphia; FA Davis Co. 1982.

Norris MC. Anesthesia for The Stressed Fetus; Obstetric Anesthesia. Philadelphia; J.B. Lippincott Company. 1993.

Lucas N, Yentis S, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, and Wee M. New grading system for urgency of caesarean section. J Royal soc med 2000; 93: 346-50.

Chesnut, DH. Obstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice. 3rded. Philadelphia; Mosby Inc. 2004

Levy D. Emergency Caesarean section; best practice. [online] [Cited 2006 July 27] Available from: URL: http://www.mrashad.stores.yahoo.net/l68.html.

James. D. Caesarean section for fetal distress. Br Med J 2001; 322: 1316-7.

Kuczkowski. KM. Anesthesia for the repeat Cesarean section in the parturient [online] [Cited 2006 July 27]

Available from: URL: http:// 10.1517/” www.expertopin.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1517/14740338.5.2.251.