The Changes of Tear Status after Conventional and Wavefront-Guided IntraLASIK

Main Article Content

Say Kiang Foo
Sharanjeet Kaur
Faudziah Abd Manan
Aloysius Joseph Low

Abstract

Background: IntraLASIK is a LASIK surgery that involved IntraLase femtosecond laser for the corneal flap creating. The objective of this research was to investigate and compare the changes in tear status at 1 and 3 months after undergoing conventional IntraLASIK with Bausch & Lomb PlanoScan (PS) algorithm, Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix Tissue Saving (ZTS) algorithm, and wavefront-guided (WG) IntraLASIK with VISX CustomVue.


Methods: Tear status of 36 patients who were divided into 3 groups depending on the type of IntraLASIK they underwent (PS, n = 13; ZTS, n = 9; WG, n = 14) was evaluated. Tear status was determined by classifying the category of the thickness of pre-corneal tear lipid layer, non-invasive tear break-up time, and tear meniscus height. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one way ANOVA were used for the statistical analyses.


Results: The category of the thickness of tear lipid layer, non-invasive tear break up time and tear meniscus height were neither significantly changed after IntraLASIK for all groups nor showed significant difference among groups at 1 and 3 months post-IntraLASIK (P > 0.05). Blinking rate and palpebral aperture also had no significant changed after IntraLASIK.


Conclusion: Both conventional (PS and ZTS) and WG IntraLASIK did not affect tear status up to 3 months post-IntraLASIK. WG IntraLASIK did not show superiority in preserving tear status 1 and 3 months post-surgery compared with conventional IntraLASIK.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Say Kiang Foo, Sharanjeet Kaur, Faudziah Abd Manan, Aloysius Joseph Low. The Changes of Tear Status after Conventional and Wavefront-Guided IntraLASIK. Malays J Med Sci [Internet]. 2011 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 22];18(2):32-9. Available from: https://ejournal.usm.my/mjms/article/view/mjms_vol18-no2-2011_5
Section
Original Articles