Foley Catheter-Assisted Evacuation of Clot Versus Conventional Craniotomy for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Single‑Centre Observational Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly recommended for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients undergoing Foley catheter-assisted MIS and those treated by conventional craniotomy in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods: A single-centre, dual-cohort observational study was conducted. A prospective cohort of consecutive patients (n = 35) who underwent Foley catheter-assisted evacuation was compared with a retrospective historical cohort (n = 35) treated with conventional craniotomy. Eligible patients were adults (18 to 75 years old) with supratentorial ICH volumes ≥ 30 mL and an admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6–12. Primary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes encompassed seizure incidence, rebleeding rates, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores at 1 month postoperatively.
Results: Compared with the conventional craniotomy cohort, the Foley catheter cohort was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (120 ± 30 mL vs 210 ± 45 mL, P = 0.042), a shorter surgery duration (150 ± 25 min vs 195 ± 35 min, P = 0.001), and a better GOS score at 3 months (4.1 ± 0.8 vs 2.9 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative seizures was also lower in the Foley catheter group (5.7% vs 25.7%, P = 0.021). Rebleeding rates did not differ significantly between the cohorts (11.4% vs 20.0%, P = 0.324). The MMSE scores at 1 month were higher in the Foley catheter cohort (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this observational cohort study, Foley catheter-assisted evacuation was associated with reduced operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, a lower incidence of seizures, and better early functional and cognitive outcomes compared with conventional craniotomy. These findings support the potential utility of this technique and warrant further investigation in larger, prospective studies to establish causal efficacy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, regional and country-specific burden of ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506396
Ramalu RR, Kandasamy R, Raffiq A, Idris Z, Adnan JS. Risk factors associated with outcome of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: Hospital Kuala Lumpur experience. Malays J Med Sci. 2022;29(1):76–90. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.1.8
Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, Dowlatshahi D, Francis B, Goldstein JN, et al. 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53(7):E282–E361. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000407
Khan MS, Shayan Shah S, Uddin N, Rahim A, Khan A, Ul Haque I, et al. Clinical outcomes of chronic subdural hematoma treated with Foley catheter drainage: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2025;87(9):5435–5441. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003614
de Oliveira Manoel AL. Surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2020;24:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-020-2749-2
Li Y, Yang H, Cao L, Wei P, Liu Y, Wang T, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in China from 2019 to 2021: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023;39:100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100870
Magid-Bernstein J, Girard R, Polster S, Srinath A, Romanos S, Awad IA, et al. Cerebral hemorrhage: pathophysiology, treatment, and future directions. Circ Res. 2022;130(8):1204–1229. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319949
Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Rosenblum M, Yenokyan G, Lane K, McBee N, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30195-3
Steiner T, Al-Shahi Salman R, Beer R, Christensen H, Cordonnier C, Csiba L, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(7):840–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJS.12309
Pradilla G, Ratcliff JJ, Hall AJ, Saville BR, Allen JW, Paulon G, et al. Trial of early minimally invasive removal of intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(14):1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2308440
Arthur AS, Jahromi BS, Saphier PS, Nickele CM, Ryan RW, Vajkoczy P, et al. Minimally invasive surgery vs medical management alone for intracerebral hemorrhage: the MIND randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2025;82(11):1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANEUROL.2025.3151
Xia Z, Wu X, Li J, Liu Z, Chen F, Zhang L, et al. Minimally invasive surgery is superior to conventional craniotomy in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WNEU.2018.04.181
Scaggiante J, Zhang X, Mocco J, Kellner CP. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018;49(11):2612–2620. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020688
Sandeep YS, Guru MR, Jena RK, Kiran Kumar VA, Agrawal A. Clinical study to assess the outcome in surgically managed patients of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017;7(4):218–223. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_22_17
de Oliveira Woehl L, Denardi PV, Scalco MLC, Pereira ES, de Lima Gibbon F, Worm PV. Minimally invasive surgery versus craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci. 2025;139:111407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111407
Ziai WC, Yarava A, Gruber JB, Li Y, Walborn N, Rizzutti N, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on midline shift and outcomes in large supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: post hoc analysis of MISTIE III. Neurocrit Care. 2026;44:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12028-025-02371-5
Mao YG, Chen JY, Wang ML, Ma YJ, Jiang C. Clinical and imaging predictors of hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: development of a prognostic model. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025;18:2865–2874. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S534564
Hughes S. Minimally[ES13.1] invasive surgery in ICH: more encouraging data? Medscape [Internet]. 2025 Feb 11 [Retrieved YYYY Mmm DD]. Available at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/minimally-invasive-surgery-ich-more-encouraging-data-2025a10003jo
Wang N, Lin W, Zhu X, Tu Q, Zhu D, Qu S, et al. Conventional craniotomy versus conservative treatment in patients with minor spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia. Chin Neurosurg J. 2022;8:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41016-022-00288-Y
Chen H, McIntyre MK, Khunte M, Malhotra A, Labib M, Colasurdo M, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus conventional neurosurgical treatments for patients with subcortical supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a nationwide study of real-world data from 2016 to 2022. Diagnostics. 2025;15(11):1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111308
Xiao Z-K, Duan Y-H, Mao X-Y, Liang R-C, Zhou M, Yang Y-M. Traditional craniotomy versus current minimally invasive surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a propensity-matched analysis. World J Radiol. 2024;16(8):317–328. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i8.317