Translation and Contextualisation of the Substance Use Disorders Module of the WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide for Primary Care Settings in Pakistan

Main Article Content

Ishrat Yousaf
Muqaddas Asif
Muqqadas Saba
Sabahat Haqqani
Ameer B. Khoso
Nasim Chaudhry

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a leading public health concern worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with an estimated 75% treatment gap. To bridge this gap, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to scale up mental health services globally and strengthen the capacity of non-specialists equipped with skills to deal with SUDs. However, its implementation in Pakistan remains limited due to the lack of an accessible Urdu-language version for frontline healthcare workers. This study describes the process of translating and contextualising the mhGAP-IG SUD module to address treatment and implementation gaps within low-resource primary healthcare settings.


Methods: We used a qualitative research design within a participatory approach. The mhGAP-IG SUD module was first translated into Urdu using the MAPI guidelines. Focus group discussions (N = 23) with key stakeholders—primary care physicians (PCPs), mental health professionals, and social workers—were conducted, along with five cognitive debriefing interviews with PCPs. A six-step framework thematic analysis informed the contextualisation and comprehension of the Urdu version of the mhGAP-IG SUD module.


Results: During contextualisation, multiple linguistic and conceptual adaptations were made without altering clinical algorithms (e.g., defining terminologies). These adaptations also featured contextually familiar expressions to improve comprehension and relevance (e.g., adding brief descriptions of technical terms) and the use of dual-language terminologies.


Conclusion: This study presents a systematic translation and contextualisation of the mhGAP-IG SUD module. The resulting Urdu version, currently published on the WHO website, is culturally appropriate and offers support to primary healthcare workers. This work demonstrates that successful contextualisation requires a culturally grounded and participatory approach. We recommend the inclusion of this guide in pre-service training and its integration into Pakistan’s primary healthcare system to ensure long-term policy support.

Article Details

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Yousaf I, Asif M, Saba M, Haqqani S, Khoso AB, Chaudhry N. Translation and Contextualisation of the Substance Use Disorders Module of the WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide for Primary Care Settings in Pakistan. Malays J Med Sci [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 31 [cited 2026 Nov. 6];33(5). Available from: https://ejournal.usm.my/mjms/article/view/mjms_vol33-no5-2026_9

References

1. World Health Organization. Mental health atlas 2024. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.

2. Lora A, Kohn R, Levav I, McBain R, Morris J, Saxena S. Service availability and utilization and treatment gap for schizophrenic disorders: a survey in 50 low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:47–54B. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.089284

3. World Health Organization. mhGAP intervention guide version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

4. Limenih G, MacDougall A, Wedlake M, Nouvet E. Depression and global mental health in the Global South: a critical analysis of policy and discourse. Int J Soc Determ Health Health Serv. 2024;54(2):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231220230

5. Siddiqui S, Khalid F, Khalid MF, Towheed A, Ahmed S, Paracha H, et al. Exploring the prevalence and determinants of substance use among drug addicts in Pakistan [preprint]. Research Square. 2024 Jul 19. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4644279/v1

6. Connery HS, McHugh RK, Reilly M, Shin S, Greenfield SF. Substance use disorders in global mental health delivery: epidemiology, treatment gap, and implementation of evidence-based treatments. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2020;28(5):316–327. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000271

7. Humayun A, Najmussaqib A. Implementing the mhGAP-HIG: the process and evaluation of training primary healthcare workers in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. BJPsych Int. 2026;23(3):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2025.10059

8. Mustafa R, Mahboob U, Khan RA, Anjum A. Impact of language barriers in doctor-patient relationships: a qualitative study. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(1):41–45. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.1.5805

9. Kaswa R. Primary healthcare approach to substance abuse management. S Afr Fam Pract. 2021;63(1):a5307. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5307

10. Ghazal P. Rising trend of substance abuse in Pakistan: a study of sociodemographic profiles of patients admitted to rehabilitation centers. Public Health. 2019;167:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.10.020

11. Chaudry MA, Niaz M, Liaqut S. Prevalence of drug use among university students in Pakistan. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2022;12(1):1–10.

12. Ahmed B, Yousaf FN, Saud M, Ahmad A. Youth at risk: the alarming issue of drug addiction in academic institutions in Pakistan. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;118:105385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105385

13. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2023. Vienna: UNODC; 2023.

14. Gutierrez D, Crowe A, Mullen PR, Pignato L, Fan S. Stigma, help-seeking, and substance use. Prof Couns. 2020;10(2):220–234. https://doi.org/10.15241/dg.10.2.220

15. Khan SJ, Asif M, Aslam S, Khan WJ, Hamza SA. Pakistan’s healthcare system: challenges and universal health coverage initiative. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44641. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44641

16. Verhey IJ, Ryan GK, Scherer N, Magidson JF. Implementation outcomes of CBT delivered by non-specialists. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00372-9

17. Agudelo-Hernández F, Giraldo-Álvarez AB. Implementation of the community component of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): a scoping review. Public Health Rev. 2025;46:1607759. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2025.1607759

18. Atif N, Bibi A, Nisar A, Zulfiqar S, Ahmed I, LeMasters K, et al. Delivering maternal mental health through peer volunteers: a 5-year report. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-019-0318-3

19. Atif N, Nazir H, Zafar S, Chaudhri R, Atiq M, Mullany LC A, et al. Development of a psychological intervention to address anxiety during pregnancy in a low-income country. Front Psychiatry. 2020;10:927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00927

20. World Health Organization. Mental health atlas 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

21. Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Participatory research methods-choice points in the research process. J Particip Res Methods. 2020;1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244

22. Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for health outcome assessments. Lyon: Mapi Institute; 2012.

23. Guest G, Namey E, McKenna K. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for non-probability sample sizes. Field Methods. 2017;29(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015

24. Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

26. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

27. Treichler EBH, Mercado R, Oakes D, Perivoliotis D, Gallegos-Rodriguez Y, Sosa E, et al. Using a stakeholder-engaged, iterative, and systematic approach to adapting collaborative decision skills training for implementation in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1543. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08833-2

28. Keynejad RC, Dua T, Barbui C, Thornicroft G. WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme intervention guide: systematic review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(1):30–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102750

29. World Health Organization. Integrating mental health into primary care: a global perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

30. Abdulmalik J, Kola L, Fadahunsi W, Adebayo K, Yasamy MT, Musa E, et al. Country contextualization of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme intervention guide: a case study from Nigeria. PLoS Med. 2013;10(8):e1001501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001501

31. Mkubwa B, Angwenyi V, Pacione L, Nzioka B, John M, Kibirige N, et al. Contextualization and adaptation of the child and adolescent mental and behavioral disorders module of the mhGAP-IG in Kilifi and Nairobi counties in Kenya. Camb Prisms Glob Ment Health. 2025;12:e92. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10049