The Challenges and Initiatives of Teaching Product Design’s Course Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the schools and universities around the globe, including Malaysia, were compelled to cease their operations and migrate to online teaching and learning environment. Along with this ‘forced approach’ to learning, the educators were faced with several barriers and challenges that need to be addressed. This paper intends to determine the challenges of teaching and learning Product Design courses in Malaysian universities using the online environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also highlights some of the strategies and initiatives adopted and adapted by the lecturers of this course in surmounting those challenges. Using a real-time video interview, data were collected from ten respondents from various faculties of Malaysian higher education institutions offering product design courses. The findings of the study point to a range of difficulties in teaching Product Design courses online, including the need for more delicate interactions to ensure efficiencies in teaching and learning design courses, as well as the evaluation methods to achieve design learning and design outcomes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdullah Sani, M. N., Mohamed Kamil, M. J., Azahari, B., & Sulaiman, A. R. (2019). The assessment of the clubfoot children’s orthotic need for the development of the foot abduction orthosis (FAO) prototype design. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 20–24.
Abidin, S. Z., Christoforidou, D., & Liem, A. (2009). Thinking and re-thinking verbal protocol analysis in design research. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), California, DS58-9, 1-11.
Cartier, P. (2011). Most valuable aspects of educational expectations of the students in design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2187–2191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.077
Chumiran, M. H., Abidin, S. Z., & Kamil, M. J. M. (2020). Pre post observation research fosters a preliminary study in product form identity. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2020, 1(September), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.41
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.09.003
Dorst, K. (2009). Layers of design: Understanding design practice. Paper presented at International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR 2009) Conference, Seoul, Korea, 18–22 October, pp. 157-166.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Dreyfuss, H. (2003). Designing for people. Skyhorse Publishing Inc.
Fu, Y. L., & Liang, K. C. (2020). Fuzzy logic programming and adaptable design of medical products for the COVID-19 anti-epidemic normalization. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 197, 105762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105762
Gill, A. S., Irwin, D. S., Ng, R. Y. K., Towey, D., Wang, T., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The future of teaching post-COVID-19: Microlearning in product design education. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2020, 780–785. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368322
Greenhalgh, S. (2016). The effects of 3D printing in design thinking and design education. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(4), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2014-0005
Hallgrimsson, B. (2012). Prototyping and modelmaking for product design. Hachette UK: Laurence King Publishing.
Holm, I. (2006). Ideas and beliefs in architecture and industrial design: How attitudes, orientations, and underlying assumptions shape the built environment (Vol. 22). Ivar Holm.
Ibrahim, A. F., Attia, A. S., Bataineh, A. M., & Ali, H. H. (2021). Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: College of Architecture at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 2345–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006
Kamil, M. J. M., & Abidin, S. Z. (2013). Unconscious human behavior at visceral level of emotional design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.016
Kamil, M. J. M., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2019a). Assessing designers’ perception, analysis, and reflective using verbal protocol analysis. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 134, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_5
Kamil, M. J. M., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2019b). Assessing the attributes of unconscious interaction between human cognition and behavior in everyday product using image-based research analysis. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 134, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_6
Liu, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Research on emotional comfort products based on innovative design thinking: Take digital aid-sleeping products for an example. E3S Web of Conferences, 236, 05084. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123605084
Liu, Y., Vijay, A., Tommasini, S. M., & Wiznia, D. (2021). Hands-on engineering courses in the COVID-19 pandemic: Adapting medical device design for remote learning. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 44, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00967-z
Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2018). Code of practice for programme accreditation. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Qualification Agency.
Martins, M. (2020). Can design survive in chaos? Reconfiguring design education while designing a digital interface for COVID-19 data collection in Brazil. Design and Culture, 13(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1858554
Mohamed Kamil, M. J., Li Shi, S. M., & Abdullah Sani, M. N. (2020). Re-assessing the design needs of trans-radial amputees in product design innovation. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 19, 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21315/ws2020.19.5
Mohamed Kamil, M. J., & Zainal Abidin, S. (2015). Unconscious interaction between human cognition and behaviour in everyday product: A study of product form entities through freehand sketching using design syntactic analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Loughborough University, Design School, Loughborough, UK, 3–4 September, pp. 369–374.
Mohamed Kamil, M. J., Zainal Abidin, S., & Hasdinor Hassan, O. (2018). The investigation of designers’ reflective practice activity using verbal protocol. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom, 6–7 September, pp. 363–368.
Monö, R. G., Knight, M., & Monö, R. (1997). Design for product understanding: The aesthetics of design from a semiotic approach. Liber. Moody, S. (1980). The role of industrial design in technological innovation. Design Studies, 1(6), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(80)90039-3
Muller, M. J., & Kogan, S. (2012). Grounded theory method in HCI and CSCW. In Human Computer Interaction Handbook, 1003–1024. Retrieved from http://domino.watson.ibm.com/cambridge/research.nsf/58bac2a2a6b05a1285256b30005b3953/818eb1454a54b9348525777d0071c35c!OpenDocument
Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and Expanded Edition). New York: Basic Books.
Ramos-Paz, S., Belmonte-Izquierdo, R., Inostroza-Moreno, L. A., Velasco-Rivera, L. F., MendozaVilla, R., & Gaona-Flores, V. (2020). Mechatronic design and robust control of an artificial ventilator in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Paper presented at 2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), Ixtapa, Mexico, 4-6 November. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258736
Rodgers, P., & Milton, A. (2011). Product design. Laurence King.
Salleh, F. I. M., Ghazali, J. M., Ismail, W. N. H. W., Alias, M., & Rahim, N. S. A. (2020). The impacts of COVID-19 through online learning usage for tertiary education in Malaysia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.30
Sani, M. N. A., Amran, A. A., Kamil, M. J. M., Romainoor, H., & Kanyan, L. R. (2020). The appropriation of product design as solution to minimise risk of exertional heat illness among Marathon runners. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 8(6), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080711
Setiadi, B. R., Puspito, J., Sudiyatno, Kurniawan, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2020). Isn’t it effective if the transformation of product design tests into 3-dimention modelling? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1700(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1700/1/012004
Simon, H. A. (1977). The structure of ill-structured problems. In Models of discovery (pp. 304–325).
Springer. Sterman, Y., Tarazi, E., Berman, O., Gur, Y., Parnas, H., Tareef, R., & Arwas, S. (2021). Safety on demand: A case study for the design and manufacturing-on-demand of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 136(January), 105162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105162
Ulrich, K. T. (2003). Product design and development. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8
Warell, A. (2008). Modelling perceptual product experience: Towards a cohesive framework of presentation and representation in design. Paper presented at the 6th Conference on Design & Emotion, School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 6–9 October.
Wijaya, H., Rouw, R. H., & Kadir, A. R. (2020). Brassica box food products as a healthy local food innovation in the Covid-19 pandemic period. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012011
Yu, F., & Da Silva, E. R. (2021). Design for robot assembly: Challenges of online education. Procedia CIRP, 100, 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.107
Zainal Abidin, S., Othman, A., Shamsuddin, Z., Samsudin, Z., & Hassan, H. (2014). The challenges of developing styling dna design methodologies for car design. Paper presented at International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, University of Twente, The Netherlands, 4–5 September, pp. 738–743. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3757.4722