Does University Students’ Adversity Quotient Influence the Constructiveness of Islamic Education Program (PAI) Online Learning? Evidence from COVID-19
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the essential components in the online education system is the potential of university students’ adversity quotient. This study focused on analysing how university students’ adversity quotient influences the constructiveness of Islamic Education Program (PAI) online learning in higher education. This research was located at the State University of Malang (UM), Indonesia, and its methodology used a qualitative approach in the form of case study. The data were collected through observation, documentation, and online-based interviews to the first years of the participating universities. Nevertheless, interactive model of Miles, Hubermann, and Saldana was used as data analysis. This study found that four indicators of university students’ adversity quotient (persistent, resilient, self-gratefulness and sincere) were able to strengthen the constructiveness of PAI online learning that is set on the philosophical foundation “students are the whole person”. These indicators of university students’ adversity quotient are increasingly honed through the assistance of humanist-religious lecturers who are able to facilitate PAI learning process in UM. The implication of this study is the emergence of the efforts to optimise the university students’ adversity quotient with the assistance of humanist-religious lecturers. The challenges faced by students, particularly when dealing with the epidemic, including disruptions to traditional learning environments.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Afifuddin, & Saebani, B. A. (2009). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (1st ed.). Pustaka Setia.
Aisa, A., & Lisvita, L. (2020). Implementation of Information Technology during Covid-19 online learning. Journal of Education and Management (JoEMS), 3(4), 47–52. http://ojs.unwaha.ac.id/index.php/joems/article/view/308
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Rahman, N. S. A. (2018). Use of e-learning by university students in Malaysian higher educational institutions: A case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. IEEE Access, 6, 14268–14276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2802325
Amir, Z. M. Z., Risnawati, Nurdin, E., Azmi, M. P., & Andrian, D. (2021). The increasing of math adversity quotient in Mathematics Cooperative Learning through metacognitive. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14448a
Ammenwerth, E., Hackl, W. O., Hoerbst, A., & Felderer, M. (2021). Indicators for cooperative, online-based learning and their role in quality management of online learning. In Research anthology on developing effective online learning courses (pp. 1709–1724). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch086
Anggraini, T. W., & Mahmudi, A. (2021). Exploring the students’ adversity quotient in online mathematics learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13617
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292–307.
Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., & Oboko, R. (2020). Research trends in measurement and intervention tools for self-regulated learning for e-learning environments: Systematic review (2008–2018). Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00129-5
Astari Putri, I. G. A. R., & Swandi, N. L. I. D. (2021). The role of adversity quotient and authoritative parenting on academic achievement of college students in Denpasar City. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v5i1.35518
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARSCoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
Basori, R., Raharjo, T. J., Prihatin, T., & Yulianto, A. (2023). Maintaining Salafi values through innovative management practices at pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.25376
Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R.M., Tamim, R.M. & Schmid, R.F. (2018). Achievement and attitudes in technology-supported postsecondary education: Complexity of relationships through the lens of meta-analysis. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World
Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1994–2003). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Chadha, N. (2021). Adversity quotient: Surviving rather than giving up. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5942–5947. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.3068
Chua, N. A., Zaid, C. M., Che Noh, C. H., Ibrahim, M. Y., Rahid, R. A., Ahmad, M., Soon, G. Y., & Saputra, J. (2021). The constructiveness of online learning in Mandarin Course during COVID-19 pandemic season. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 5701–5713). IEOM Society International. https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210960
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hailkari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2021). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
Hanum, L. (2018). Differences in student adversity intelligence by gender. Honai: International Journal for Educational, Social, Political and Cultural Studies, 1(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.2121/.v1i2.1110
Hasan, I., Abdullah, T., & Sunaryo, W. (2021). Strengthening organizational climate, transformational leadership and adversity to improve teacher performance: An empirical study on Private Junior High School Teachers in Depok City. Multicultural Education, 7(7),
–221. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5093920
Hasanah, N. U. (2019). Universitas Negeri Malang masuk dalam lima terbaik penerapan kuliah daring Kemenristekdikti. Suryamalang.Tribunnews.Com. https://suryamalang.tribunnews.com/2018/01/12/universitas-negeri-malang-masuk-dalam-lima-terbaik-penerapan-kuliahdaring-kemenristekdikti
Hema, G., & Gupta, S. M. (2015). Adversity quotient for prospective higher education. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(3), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.25215/0203.080
Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jomeh, S. M. E., & Tabatabei, S. M. (2022). The relationship between curriculum and learning methods of Mulla Sadra’s Philoasophy. Interchange, 53, 583–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-022-09473-5
Jumareng, H., & Setiawan, E. (2021). Self-esteem, adversity quotient and self-handicapping: Which aspects are correlated with achievement goals? Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan 40(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.37685
Kartikasari, N. P. D., & Wiarta, I. W. (2021). The contribution of adversity quotient dan working motivation to teachers’ performance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 540, 469–477. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.280
Khomarul Hidayat. (2021). Corona Indonesia Update, 21 October: Add 633 new cases, don’t be careless. Kontan.co.id. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/update-corona-indonesia-21-oktober-tambah-633-kasus-baru-jangan-lengah
Kumi-Yeboah, A., Kim, Y., & Armah, Y. E. (2023). Strategies for overcoming the digital divide during the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education institutions in Ghana. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1441–1462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/
bjet.13356
Mahmudah, M. & Zuhriah, F. (2021). Konsep adversity quotient (AQ) dalam menghadapi cobaan: Ditinjau dari perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadis [Adversity quotient (AQ) concept in the face of trials: Reviewed from the perspective of the qur’an and hadith]. Tarbiyah Islamiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.18592/jtipai.v11i1.4781
Mahsusi, Hudaa, S., Fahmi, M., Kusen, Haryanti, N. D., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2024). Achieving excellence: the role of digital transformation in madrasah management and Islamic culture. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1), 2304407. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2304
Mardiana, D., & Anggraini, D. C. (2019). The effectiveness of utilising web-learning media towards Islamic Education Learning (PAI) outcome in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(1), 80–96.
Mardiana, D., Tobroni, & Supriyatno, T. (2021). The development of students’ adversity quotient through online learning models: A case study of an Islamic education course. Communication in Humanities and Social Science, 1(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.1.1.2021.10
Martono, F., & Salam, U. (2017). Students’ learning in asynchronous discussion forums: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017010105
Maryati, N. P. S., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2021). Self-motivation and adversity quotient moderates the effect of exam costs on student interest in taking the Chartered Accountant Certification Exam. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 74–84. www.ajhssr.com
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mutmainah, S., Rofeq, A., Rifa’i, A., & Febrianto, M. V. (2021). An analysis of students’ learning pattern: a study on the new learning paradigm by using virtual technology in Covid-19 pandemic. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 747(1), 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012082
Nursa’adah, F. P., & Rosa, N. M. (2016). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif Kimia ditinjau dari adversity quotient, sikap ilmiah dan minat belajar. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 6(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v6i3.992
Parker, E. T., & Trolian, T. L. (Eds.) (2024). Promoting meaningful student: Faculty experiences in graduate (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003296508
Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between adversity quotient and academic problems among student teachers. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191172326
PDDikti. (2020). Profil Perguruan Tinggi. Pangkalan Data Perguruan Tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/data_pt/N0FDNTEyNjUtRUNDMi00NEQ3LThGQjItNzE3RDNDRjFBQkM1
Phoolka, S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 227–244.
Phutela, N., & Dwivedi, S. (2020). A qualitative study of students’ perspective on e-learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2019-0041
Puriani, R. A., Dewi, R. S., Mimhamimdala, F., & Yanti, P. (2021). Analysis of adversity quotient on problem solving skills of students guidance and counseling FKIP Sriwijaya University. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.51214/bocp.v3i1.54
Puspitacandri, A., Warsono, Roesminingsih, E., Soesatyo, Y., & Susanto, H. (2020). The effects of intelligence, emotional, spiritual and adversity quotient on the graduates quality in Surabaya Shipping Polytechnic. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1075
Rasyid, A., Muvid, M. B., Lubis, M. A., & Kurniawan, P. (2022). The actualization of the concept of national fiqh in building religious moderation in Indonesia. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(2), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art5
Rita, A., Widodo, W., & Chandrawaty, C. (2021). How adversity quotient and organizational justice reduce turnover intention empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.1171
Roßnagel, C. S., Fitzallen, N., & Baido, K. L. (2020). Constructive alignment and the learning experience: relationships with student motivation and perceived learning demands. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(4), 838–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1787956
Sidabutar, U. B. (2012). The influence of website-based learning models and adversity quotient on Computer Programming learning outcomes in the Department of Electrical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering UNIMED. Universitas Negeri Medan.
Siswanto, H., Hariri, H., Sowiyah, S., & Ridwan, R. (2020). The influence of principal performance on teachers’ pedagogical competence. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education (JSHE), 1(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i1.259
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient®: Turning obstacles into opportunities. John Wiley & Sons Publisher.
Suheri, Setyosari, P., Utaya, S., & Ery Tri Djatmika, R. W. (2021). Adversity quotient among students at traditional moslem school. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.1.30
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Suryadi, B., & Santoso, T. I. (2017). Self-efficacy, adversity quotient, and students’ achievement in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n10p12
Suryani, S., & Oktavia, N. A. (2019). Pro-session (Self Compassion Program) in improving academic Resilience of Muslim Students. Jurnal Konseling Religi, 12(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.21043/kr.v12i2.12687
Suti’ah, & Mardiana, D. (2021). Innovation in the development of Islamic Education Learning Strategies (PAI): Concepts and challenges in facing the New Normal Era. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 7262–7271. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.3304
Syarif, S. (2021). Understanding the teaching of religious moderation from a Sufistic perspective and its implications for student performance. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 320–343.
Tengku Kasim, T. S. A., & Abdul Majid, A. (2020). Stress and coping strategies amongst Islamic Education novice teachers. Journal of Usuluddin, 48(2), 195–226. https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol48no2.7
Tian, Y., & Fan, X. (2014). Adversity quotients, environmental variables and career adaptability in student nurses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.07.006
Tsai, Y. N., Chen, M. N., & Fang, C. C. (2024). The study on the acceptance and learning effectiveness of using E-learning for students in Fine Art and Design Colleges. IEEE Access, 12, 42055–42067. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3379145
Ubani, M. (2023). Theologies, religion and literacy: Towards socially sustainable religious education? In L. Gearon, A. Kuusisto, S. Poulter, A. Toom, & M. Ubani (Eds.), Religion and worldviews in education: The New Watershed (1st ed., pp. 134–148). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003265696-12
Unit Hubungan Masyarakat. (2019). Sukacita penyambutan mahasiswa internasional di Kampus UM. Berita Terkini. https://um.ac.id/berita/sukacita-penyambutan-mahasiswa-internasional-dikampus-um/
Van der Merwe, T. M. D., Serote, M., & Maloma, M. (2023). A systematic review of the challenges of e-Learning implementation in Sub-Saharan African Countries: 2016–2022. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(5), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3075
Vinas, D. K. D., & Aquino-Malabanan, M. G. (2015). Adversity quotient and coping strategies of college students in Lyceum of the Philippines University. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(3), 68–72.
Wirabrata, D. G. F., & Handayani, D. A. P. (2021). Adversity quotients towards achievement motivation of Early Childhood Teacher Education (PG PAUD) students in Bali. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 540, 234–236. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.244
Woo, H. Y., & Song, J. H. (2015). The factors affecting the adversity quotient of nurses and office workers. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 7(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijbsbt.2015.7.5.01
Yoga, M. (2016). Adversity quotient: So that children don’t give up easily (I). Tiga Serangkai.
Zarghami-Hamrah, S. (2016). Investigating the role of ICT in educational equality: A revision of philosophical approaches. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(7), 1331–1337. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.1331.1337
Zhilbayev, Z. O., Moiseeva, L. V., & Barsanova, M. V. (2018). Pedagogical frameworks of education policy for sustainable development of the Eurasian space. The Education and Science Journal, 20(6), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-9-28