The “Silver Lining” of The Pandemic: The Development of English Teachers’ Technological Competency during The Emergency Remote Teaching in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Maulana Mualim
Sulis Triyono
Dwiyanto Djoko Pranowo

Abstract

Along with turmoil in human life, COVID-19 brought opportunities for English teachers to develop their technological competence. English teachers’ technological competence is needed to bring more effective teaching and assessment. This qualitative study attempts to shed light on the development of English teachers’ technological competence in Banyumas as the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The research questions are: (1) How is the teachers’ technological competence before the pandemic; (2) How is their technological competence during the pandemic? and (3) How is the comparison between the two conditions? Six English high school teachers participated in this study. They were selected through a purposive sampling technique to give the needed information for the purpose of the research. Data were collected through virtual interviews, observations, and documentation. The data were then analysed through Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model developed by R. R. Puentedura in 2011. The results exposed that the teachers’ technological competence before the pandemic is in the stages of Substitution and Augmentation. When the pandemic struck and they had no way but to integrate technology, their competency increased into the Modification stage. However, activities belonging to the Redefinition stage were not shown. The development of teachers’ technological competence is seen as the “silver lining” of the pandemic. The limitation of this research lies in the small number of samples that the result could not represent generalisation. Also, this research focuses on the performance of the teachers without investigating the factors that influence their action such as age, gender, training, and school facility.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aldosemani, T. (2019). Inservice teachers’ perceptions of a professional development plan based on SAMR model: A case study. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 46–53. Retrieved from https://educationstudies.org.uk/?p=6141

Ayçiçek, B., & Karafil, B. (2021). Exploring perspectives of secondary school teachers on technology integration in education during pandemic. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.821577

Bicalho, R. N. de M., Coll, C., Engel, A., & Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2022). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: Propositions to the SAMR model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x

Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3(June), 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093

Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., & Suryani. (2021). COVID-19, emergency remote teaching evaluation: The case of Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2165–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10680-3

Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Aiusheeva, M., & Grits, D. (2021). Toward a model of learning innovation integration: TPACK-SAMR based analysis of the introduction of a digital learning environment in three Russian universities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4925–4942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10514-2

Grammens, M., Voet, M., Vanderlinde, R., Declercq, L., & De Wever, B. (2022). A systematic review of teacher roles and competences for teaching synchronously online through videoconferencing technology. Educational Research Review, 37, 100461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100461

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y

Hermansyah, & Aridah. (2021). Teachers’ perception toward the challenges in online English teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Lingusitics, 6(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.342

Hockly, N., Dudeney, G., & Pegrum, M. (2014). Digital literacies (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832913

Jude, L., Kajura, M., & Birevu, M. (2014). Adoption of the SAMR model to asses ICT pedagogical adoption: A case of makerere university. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2014.V4.312

Kemendikbud. (2020). Surat edaran sekretaris jenderal no.15 tahun 2020 pedoman pelaksanaan belajar dari rumah selama darurat bencana COVID-19 di Indonesia. Sekretariat Nasional SPAB (Satuan Pendidikan Aman Bencana), 15, 1–16.

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716

Kim, L. E., Leary, R., & Asbury, K. (2021). Teachers’ narratives during COVID-19 partial school reopenings: An exploratory study. Educational Research, 63(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1918014

Kılıçkaya, F. (2023). Transition to online assessment: Opportunities and challenges for language lecturers in the EFL tertiary context. In M.-M. Suárez & W. M. El-Henawy (Eds.), Optimizing online Englsih language learning and teaching (pp. 153–170). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27825-9

Krajka, J. (2021). Teaching grammar and vocabulary in COVID-19 times: Approaches used in online teaching in polish schools during a pandemic. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.29140/JALTCALL.V17N2.379

Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2021). Thriving or surviving emergency remote teaching necessitated by COVID-19: University teachers’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00567-9

Mouw, J. M., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Kupers, E., & Korpershoek, H. (2023). Technology-supported teaching in times of COVID-19’s first period of emergency remote teaching: An exploratory analysis of influencing factors. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 43(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2208789

Nair, R. S., & Chuan, T. C. (2021). Integrating technology that uses modified SAMR model as a pedagogical framework in evaluating learning performance of undergraduates. The Educational Review, 5(10), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2021.10.001

Nugroho, A., & Haghegh, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching amidst global pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL teachers. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i1.3258

Öçal, T., Halmatov, M., & Ata, S. (2021). Distance education in COVID-19 pandemic: An evaluation of parent’s, child’s and teacher’s competences. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6901–6921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10551-x

Pawan, F., Wiechart, K. A., Warren, A. N., & Park, J. (2016). Pedagogy and practice for online English language teacher education. Alexandria: TESOL Press.

Puentedura, R. R. (2014). Learning, technology, and the SAMR model: Goals, processes, and practice. Ruben R. Puentedura’s Weblog. Retrieved from https://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/LearningTechnologySAMRModel.pdf

Puentedura, R. R. (2011). A brief Introduction to TPCK and SAMR metaphors. Ruben R. Puentedura’s Weblog. Retrieved from https://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2011/12/08/BriefIntroTPCKSAMR.pdf

Rahiem, M. D. H. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1

Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2016). Investigating teacher presence in courses using synchronous videoconferencing. Distance Education, 37(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1232157

Robinson, L. E., Valido, A., Drescher, A., Woolweaver, A. B., Espelage, D. L., LoMurray, S., Long, A. C. J., Wright, A. A., & Dailey, M. M. (2023). Teachers, stress, and the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis. School Mental Health, 15, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09533-2

Romrell, D., Kidder, L. C., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Online Learning Journal, 18(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.435

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

Sumardi, S., & Nugrahani, D. (2021). Adaptation to emergency remote teaching: Pedagogical strategy for pre-service language teachers amid COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 22(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906553

Xu, S., Cheng, B., Huang, Z., Liu, T., Li, Y., Jiang, L., Guo, W., & Xiong, J. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 on electricity consumption of open university campus buildings: The case of Twente University in the Netherlands. Energy and Buildings, 279, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112723

Yen, T. V. M., & Nhi, N. T. U. (2021). The practice of online English teaching and learning with Microsoft Teams: From students’ view. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(2), 51–57.

Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (8th ed.). Ankara: Seckin Publishing House.