Factors Affecting Behavioural Intention to Continuously Adopt E-Learning: The Case of Myanmar and Vietnamese University Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the landscape of science online learning mediums in Indonesia through
bibliometric analysis sourced from Google Scholar and Scopus spanning from 2017 to 2022. A total of
259 articles were sampled for analysis. The findings revealed an upward trend in research on science online learning mediums in Indonesia from 2019 to 2021, followed by a decline in 2022. Video-based Science Learning Mediums, Websites and E-Modules emerged as the top three mediums for online science learning. The results of data visualisation and content analysis indicated that research methodologies in this field predominantly employed the research and development approach, complemented by data analysis tools such as questionnaires and quantitative descriptive data analysis. Furthermore, the research primarily focused on the Elementary School level, with minimal attention given to studies conducted at the University level. Additionally, the examination of learning outcomes associated with science online learning mediums predominantly centered on cognitive learning outcomes. The implications of these findings offer valuable insights and recommendations for future research endeavours in this domain.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alassaf, M. O. (2022). E-learning intention material using TAM: A case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61(3), 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.457
Al-hawari, M. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010). The influence of technology acceptance model (TAM) factors on students’ e-satisfaction and e-retention within the context of UAE e-learning. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(4), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981011089596
Bordia, S., & Lam, P. (2008). Factors affecting student choice of e-learning over traditional learning: Student and teacher perspectives. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 14(12), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v14i12/45546
Buana, A., & Linarti, U. (2021). Measurement of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in using e-learning in higher education. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, 14(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.24036/jtip.v14i2.471
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Desai, M. S., Hart, J., & Richards, T. C. (2008). E-learning: Paradigm shift in education. Education, 129(2), 327–334.
Dramani, I. E., Tang, Z., & Coffie, C. P. (2022). Usage intention of e-learning systems in Ghanaian tertiary institutions: A case study of the university for development studies. Sustainability, 14(12), 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127360
Ejdys, J. (2018). Building technology trust in ICT application at a university. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 980–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-07-2017-0234
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Giovannini, C. J., Ferreira, J. B., Silva, J. F., & Ferreira, D. B. (2015). The effects of trust transference, mobile attributes and enjoyment on mobile trust. BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 12(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015140052
Habes, M., Salloum, S. A., Alghizzawi, M., & Alshibly, M. S. (2018). The role of modern media technology in improving collaborative learning of students in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 2(3), 71–82.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Hassan, R. (2021). Factors and challenges that influence higher education students’ acceptance of e-learning system after Coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(11), 2554–2566.
Kaasa, A., & Andriani, L. (2022). Determinants of institutional trust: The role of cultural context. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000199
Kamalasena, B., & Sirisena, A. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning by university students in Sri Lanka: Application of UTAUT-3 Model during COVID-19 pandemic. Wayamba Journal of Management, 12(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.4038/wjm.v12i2.7533
Khafit, A., Sulastri, S., & Fauzan, S. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Measurement of e- learning use by accounting students at Malang State University. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 3(3), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v3i3.969
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kusumadewi, A. N., Lubis, N. A., Prastiyo, R. A., & Tamara, D. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the use of online learning applications during the COVID-19 pandemic for parents of elementary school students. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i1.120
Lazim, C. S., Ismail, N. D., & Tazilah, M. D. (2021). Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) towards online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13–20.
Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230210
Lu, B., & Wang, Z. (2022). Trust transfer in sharing accommodation: The moderating role of privacy concerns. Sustainability, 14(12), 7384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127384
Lu, B., Zeng, Q., & Fan, W. (2016). Examining macro-sources of institution-based trust in social commerce marketplaces. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 20(3), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.004
Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: An empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6629–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8
Majid, F. A., & Shamsudin, N. M. (2019). Identifying factors affecting acceptance of virtual reality in classrooms based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Asian Journal of University Education, 15(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i2.7556
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Factors affecting the e-learning outcomes: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.002
Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S. S., Goswami, S., & Thakre, S. (2022). Adoption of online education channel during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic lockdown: An empirical study from push-pull-mooring framework. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00193-w
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods qualitative and quantitavie approach (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Ngafeeson, M. N., & Gautam, Y. (2021). Learning management system adoption: A theory of planned behavior approach. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2021010104
Nguyen, V. K., Le, T. M., Duong, T. N., Nguyen, T. S., Le, T. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2022). Assessing student’s adoption of e-learning: An integration of TAM and TPB framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 297–335. https://doi.org/10.28945/5000
Pham, T. T., Le, H. A., & Do, D. T. (2021). The factors affecting students’ online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Bayesian exploratory factor analysis. Education Research International, 2021, 2669098. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2669098
Phiakoksong, S., Noimano, S., & Pentamwa, P. (2021). Does the choice of teaching approach and ICT affect teaching quality during the global COVID-19 pandemic? A case study from Suranaree University of Technology. Asia Social Issues, 16(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.251455
Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, V., & Saravanakumar, A. (2020). E-learning during lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 1088–1099.
Ramadiani, R., Azainil, A., Khairina, D. M., & Jundillah, M. L. (2021). Factors affecting the failure and success of online learning in Samarinda. Journal of Educational Administration Research and Review, 5(1), 31–37.
Saleh, S. S., Nat, M., & Aqel, M. (2022). Sustainable adoption of e-learning from the TAM perspective. Sustainability, 14(6), 3690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063690
Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
Salmani, N., Bagheri, I., & Dadgari, A. (2022). Iranian nursing students experiences regarding the status of e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263388
Sarosa, S., & Setyowati, A. R. (2022). Trust and perceived risks in high school students’ online learning behaviour during COVID-19 pandemic. Intensif, 6(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v6i1.16477
Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810
Su, C. E., Su, M. T., Li, C. -K., & Liu, L. (2020). An exploration of online learning readiness for university students in Myanmar. Journal of Buriram Rajabhat University, 8(2), 109–127.
Taat, M. S., & Francis, A. (2020). Factors influencing the students’ acceptance of e-learning at Teacher Education Institute: An exploratory study in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p133
The, M. M., & Usagawa, T. (2018). Change in e-learning readiness and challenge for Myanmar Higher Education. Creative Education, 9(9), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.99095
Tri, L. D., & Loc, V. B. (2013). Factors influencing the trust of young customers while using e-commerce websites. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 3(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.3.1.105.2013
Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building student trust in online learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955267
Yen, S. -C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
Zhao, J. -D., Huang, J. -S., & Su, S. (2019). The effects of trust on consumers’ continuous purchase intentions in C2C social commerce: A trust transfer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.014