A Combined Approach to Developing EFL University Students’ Academic Essay Writing Skills: An Intervention Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Many researchers have acknowledged the tangible benefits of a combined approach to teaching second-language (L2) writing in multiple genres. However, little empirical evidence was available in the literature. Therefore, we initiated a quasi-experimental study to examine the impact of a combined approach on teaching essay writing. Eventually, an experimental group of 100 randomly selected university students received instruction in L2 writing through the combined approach. Measurements were taken to evaluate the progress of learners through essay-writing activities in different genres for a semester. All essays were evaluated against a rubric for criteria covering organisation, content, vocabulary, cohesion, structure, and mechanics. Results indicate immediate and significant improvements in students’ performance from their first essay, with positive outcomes maintained through the final essays. However, some factors demonstrated a bigger change than others. The areas where the students’ improvements were mostly identified included content, organisation and cohesion, vocabulary, and structure. In contrast, the development of using mechanics in their writing was relatively low. The study has pedagogical implications for the researchers and practitioners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL) contexts. The way to apply a combined approach in writing classes and the method of researching the outcome of such a teaching strategy, as briefly presented in this study, could be exercised in EFL or ESL writing classes through adoption or adaptation processes. Introducing the approach in essay writing classes could be especially effective.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Afrin, S. (2016). Writing problems of non-English major undergraduate students in Bangladesh: An observation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.43016
Akter, F. (2022). Writing challenges in the EFL context of Bangladesh. Journal of ELT and Education, 5(1), 30–35.
Al Bloushi, B. J., & Al Shuraiaan, A. (2024). Product approach and process approach and their significance to teaching writing in TESOL and how they are utilized in ELT classes. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(3), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol12n3722
Ara, A. (2021). The relevance of the genre approach in the context of the tertiary level students of Bangladesh. Erevna: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(2), 51–62.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2021). Hong Kong secondary students’ self-regulated learning strategy use English writing: Influences of motivational beliefs. System, 96, 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102404
Belmekki, A., & Sekkal, F. (2018). The effect of process-genre approach on ESL students’ achievement in writing business letters. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 6(2), 10 pp.
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.). (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7
Clark, I. L. (2011). Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing. Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1995). Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The power of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 1–21). Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. & Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. London, United Kingdom: SAGE.
Deng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ generic competence: A genre-based and process-genre approach. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54845-1
Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performance: John Swales’ genre analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008
El Ouidani, Y., & Madaoui, R. (2024). Enhancing L2 learners’ writing: Impact of product and process approaches. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v8i1.5313
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). It can be taught, but it does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(3), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1997.12085875
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
Ghufron, M. A. (2016). Process-genre approach, product approach, and students’ self-esteem in teaching writing. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(1), 37–54.
Hamid, M. O., & Erling, E. J. (2016). English-in-education policy and planning in Bangladesh: A critical examination. In English language education policy in Asia (pp. 25–48). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_2
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223
Humphery, S., & Macnaught, L. (2011). Revising joint construction in the tertiary context. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651848
Hyland, K. (2003a). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
Hyland, K. (2003b). Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10204
Hyland, K. (2007). English for specific purposes. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 391–402). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_28
Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. In I. R. Manchon (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.05hyl
Ismail, S. A. M. M., Karim, A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2018). The role of gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity in predicting ESL learners’ reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 457–484.
Jeyaraj, J. J. (2020). Academic writing needs of postgraduate research students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.1
Jung, Y., Kim, J., So, M., & Kim, H. (2015). Statistical relationships between journal use and research output at academic institutions in South Korea. Scientometrics, 103(3), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1563-0
Kane, T. S., & Peters, L. J. (2004). Writing prose. Oxford University Press.
Karim, A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2019). Examining the impact of an English in action training program on secondary-school English teachers’ classroom practice in Bangladesh. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3703
Karim, A., Ahmed, Z., Shahed, F. H., Rahman, M. M., & Mohamed, A. R. (2019). Challenges affecting the implementation of £50 million in-service training program for English teachers in Bangladesh. The Qualitative Report, 24(10), 2457–2485. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.4009
Karim, A., Kabilan, M. K., Rahman, S., Shahed, F. H., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Revisiting the high profile English in action teacher professional development program in Bangladesh: Promises, prospects, and eventualities. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n2-6
Karim, A., Islam, M. S., Hamid, M. O., Rahman, M. M., & Amin, E. U. (2023a). Language ideology, development of English proficiency, and performance in professional communication: voices of STEM+ business graduates of English medium university. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00200-w
Karim, A., Kabilan, M. K., Ahmed, Z., Reshmin, L., & Rahman, M. M. (2023b). The medium of instruction in Bangladeshi higher education institutions: Bangla, English, or both?. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 22(3), 232–246.
Lefkowitz, N. (2009). The Future of Foreign Language Writing [Paper presentation]. The Symposium on Second Language Writing.,Tempe, AZ.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Manchon, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.07man
McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A discussion of Japanese to English contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213488386
Memari Hanjani, A., & Li, L. (2014). EFL learners’ written reflection on their experience of attending a process genre-based, student-centred essay writing course. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 149–166.
Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2014). Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education, 28, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.002
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
Nordin, S. & Mohammad, N. (2006). The best two approaches: Process/genre-based approach to teaching writing. The English Teacher, 30, 75–85.
Numanee, I. Z., Zafar, N., Karim, A., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2020). Developing empathy among first-year university undergraduates through English language course: A phenomenological study. Heliyon, 6(6), e04021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04021
Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 348–366). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch18
Pasand, P. G. (2013). Process-product approach to writing: The effect of sampling on EFL. The Iranian EFL Journal, 9(4), 280–286.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
Racelis, J. V., & Matsuda, P. K. (2013). Integrating process and genre into second language writing classroom: Research into practice. Language Teaching, 46(3), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000116
Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). A critical investigation of English language teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of communicative language teaching. English Today, 34(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841700061X
Rahman, M. M., & Singh, M. K. M. (2020). Language ideology of English-medium instruction in higher education: A case study from Bangladesh. English Today, 36(4), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000294
Rahman, M. M., & Singh, M. K. M. (2022). English medium university STEM teachers’ and students’ ideologies in constructing content knowledge through translanguaging. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(7), 2435–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1915950
Rahman, M., & Hasan, K. (2019). Academic writing difficulties of Bangladeshi students at a higher institution in Malaysia. Journal of Research and Multidisciplinary, 2(2), 145–171.
Ramos, M. S. Y., Miñoza, M., & Alieto, E. (2019). Effect of product and process approach on students’ composition writing competence: An experiemental design. Science International (Lahore), 31(5), 641–645.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney schools. London, England: Equinox.
Sarkar, J. P. S., Karim, A., Kabilan, M. K., & Sultana, S. (2021). A phenomenological study of the language ideology, language management, and language practice in English-medium universities in Bangladesh: Lecturers’ and students’ voices. The Qualitative Report, 26(4), 1248–1274. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4448
Shurovi, M., Hasan, M. K., Dhaka, B. F. Z., & Sultana, M. (2022). Are the socio-economic factors predictors of EFL students’ writing anxiety? A study of Bangladeshi tertiary students. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v46n1-14
Singh, M. K. M. (2019). International graduate students’ academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v5i1.439
Vuong, Q. H. (2019). The harsh world of publishing in emerging regions and implications for editors and publishers: The case of Vietnam. Learned Publishing, 32(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1255
Wei, L., Lin, H. H., & Litton, F. (2018). Communicative language teaching (CLT) in EFL context in Asia. Asian Culture and History, 10(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v10n2p1
Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.005
Wingate, U. (2012). Argument! helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Xu, X., & Li, X. (2018). Teaching academic writing through a process-genre approach: A pedagogical exploration of an EAP program in China. TESL-EJ, 22(2), n2.
Yasuda, S. (2015). Exploring changes in FL writers’ meaning-making choice in summary writing: A systemic functional approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.008
You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.11.001
Yu, S., Zhou, N., Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Cao, H., & Li, X. (2019). Evaluating student motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL writing context. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.06.002
Zhang, L. J. (2016). Reflections on the pedagogical imports of western practices for professionalizing ESL/EFL writing and writing-teacher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.3.01zha
Zhang, L. J., Aryadoust, V., Zhang, D. (2016). Taking stock of the effects of strategies-based instruction on writing in Chinese and English in Singapore primary schools. In R. E. Silver, & W. Bokhorst-Heng (Eds.). Quadrilingual education in Singapore: Pedagogical innovation in language education (pp. 103–126). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-967-7_7