A Comparison of the Expected and Performed Roles of the Geotourism Stakeholders at Hummanaya, Sri Lanka
https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2023.2.2.9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2023.2.2.9Keywords:
Blowhole, Geotourism, Stakeholder, Roles Assessment, Sri LankaAbstract
Geotourism is a niche market that sells the geographic uniqueness of places, and Hummānaya is one such destination. Geotourism stakeholders are agents who shape, positively or negatively, the geographical characteristics of a place. They have three key roles to play to sustain and even enhance the geotourism allure of a destination and the well-being of its residents. Those roles are programming, facilitating, and gatekeeping. The Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) has suggested several strategies and management actions for the stakeholders to implement in Hummānaya, one of the geotourism destinations in Southern Sri Lanka, to sustainably develop the area while mitigating the socio-cultural, economic, and environmental issues in the area. The primary objectives of the research were to identify the geotourism stakeholders of the Hummānaya destination and to examine the extent to which the stakeholders have fulfilled the responsibilities suggested by the SAMP and other literature over the past two decades. Key informant interviews and observation methods were conducted to collect data and information. Seventy-seven key informants were involved in key informant interviews. State-centric stakeholders were identified as having played programming and facilitating roles to some extent but neglected the gatekeeping role. The local community is not fully committed to sustainably programming the ecotourism activities and gatekeeping activities in the destination and facilitating them for tourists, even though some facilities are provided. Also, they have not become the custodians of the destination. Thus, to make Hummānaya a sustainable tourism destination, this study recommends that each stakeholder should pay enough attention to fulfil all three roles.
References
Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. (2005). Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 28–48.
Blamey, R. K. (2001). Principles of ecotourism. In D. B. Weaver (Ed.), The encyclopedia of ecotourism (pp. 5–22). CABI Publishing.
Coast Conservation Department. (1990). Coastal zone management plan. Coastal Resources Center. https://www.crc.uri.edu/download/SLCZMPlan90.pdf
Coast Conservation Department. (1997). Revised coastal zone management plan, Sri Lanka 1997. Coastal Resources Center. https://www.crc.uri.edu/download/SLCZPlan97.pdf
de Livera, L. (2022). Blow hole (Hummānaya) at Dikwella. AmazingLanka.com. https://amazinglanka.com/wp/blow-hole-Hummānaya-at-dikwella/
Dowling, R., & Newsome, D. (2010). The future of geotourism: Where to from here? In D. Newsome & R. Dowling (Eds.), Geotourism: The tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow Publishers.
Dowling, R. K. (2013). Global geotourism: An emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 59–79. https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/426732.pdf
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C. O. A., Costa, C. M. M. da, & Carvalho, C. N. (Eds.). (2012). Geoparks and geotourism: New approaches to sustainability for the 21st century. BrownWalker Press.
Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and sustainable development: Who owns paradise? (2nd ed.). Island Press.
Katupotha, K. N. J., & Ranasinghe, I. (2000). Special area management plan for Mawella and Kudawella coastal area. Southern Development Authority of Sri Lanka.
Katupotha, K. N. J., Wickramasinghe, U., & Ranasinghe, I. (2000). Economic valuation of Kudawella Blowhole–Hummānaya. Southern Development Authority of Sri Lanka.
Mowforth, M., & Munt, I. (2016). Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the Third World. Routledge.
National Geographic. (2022). What is geotourism? Four Corners Region. https://fourcornersgeotourism.com/entries/what-is-geotourism/642ba470-4085-45e8-96d0-5b587921f198
Pathmasiri, E. H. G. C. (2019). Geographical characteristics of ecotourism according to stakeholders: A case study of Dambana, Eppawala, Kudawa and Meemure regions in Sri Lanka [Doctoral dissertation, Sangmyung University].
Reynard, E. (2008). Scientific research and tourism promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 31, 225–230.
Saffinee, S. S., Jamaludin, M. A., Kartika, B., Syahrir, W. J. N. W. M., & Halim, S. A. (2020, December 14). A systematic review of tourism stakeholders' roles practices towards sustainable tourism using Khalifa perspectives. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development. http://www.jised.com/PDF/JISED-2020-34-12-04.pdf
Sumanapala, D., Kubalíková, L., & Wolf, I. D. (2021). Assessing geosites for geotourism development: Case studies from the southern part of Sri Lanka. Geoheritage, 13, Article 85.
Swarbrooke, J. (1999). Sustainable tourism management. CABI.
Tangalle Pradeshiya Sabha. (2021). Tourism-based landscape development at Blowhole vicinity, Sri Lanka.
The International Congress of Geotourism. (2011, November 12). Arouca declaration on geotourism. European Geoparks Network. https://www.europeangeoparks.org/?p=223
Turker, N., Alaeddinoglu, F., & Can, A. S. (2016, July 12–14). The role of stakeholders in sustainable tourism development in Safranbolu, Turkey. 2016 International Conference on Hospitality, Leisure, Sports, and Tourism—Summer Session
UNESCO. (2022, April 21). UNESCO designates 8 new Global Geoparks. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-designates-8-new-global-geoparks
Waidyasekera, A. (2009, November 24). ‘Hummānaya’ developed. The Island.
Weaver, D. B. (Ed.). (2001). The encyclopedia of ecotourism. CABI Publishing.
Williams, S. (1998). Tourism geography. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Asian Geography

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.