Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using the DRASTIC Method: A Case Study of the Bued River Watershed

Authors

  • Marie Charie D. Santos University of the Cordilleras, Philippines
  • Kelvin Carlo S. Gaerlan University of the Cordilleras, Philippines
  • Ryka S. Palberas University of the Cordilleras, Philippines
  • Jovertlee C. Pudan University of the Cordilleras, Philippines
  • Nathaniel Lubrica University of the Cordilleras, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2026.5.1.4

Keywords:

DRASTIC model, Groundwater vulnerability assessment, Bued Watershed, Geographic Information System, Water management

Abstract

Groundwater plays a critical role in sustaining water supply for domestic, agricultural, and industrial uses, particularly in urbanising watersheds such as the Bued River Watershed in the Philippines. This study assessed the groundwater vulnerability of the watershed using the DRASTIC model integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping. The methodology involved evaluating seven hydrogeological parameters: depth to water table, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, impact of the vadose zone, and hydraulic conductivity. Data were obtained from relevant government agencies and processed using GIS to generate individual thematic layers and a composite vulnerability map. The findings indicate that approximately 90% of the watershed falls within a moderate vulnerability index, particularly in areas underlain by bedded sandstone, marine clastic formations, and karstic limestone lithologies, which are characterised by high permeability. In contrast, areas dominated by igneous and metamorphic rocks exhibited lower vulnerability due to their reduced porosity and permeability. The study concludes that the Bued River Watershed is moderately vulnerable to groundwater contamination, especially in its northern and central zones. It is recommended that local government units and water management agencies utilise the vulnerability map to inform land-use planning, groundwater protection strategies, and policy development. Future research should incorporate temporal assessments and additional hydrogeological data to improve the robustness and applicability of the findings.

References

Alley, W. M., Reilly, T. E., & Franke, O. L. (2002). Sustainability of ground-water resources (U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186). https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1186/

Aller, L., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R., & Bennett, T. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system to evaluate groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 29(1), 23–37.

Amadi, A. N., Olasehinde, P. I., Nwankwoala, H. O., Dan-Hassan, M. A., & Okoye, N. O. (2014). Aquifer vulnerability studies using the DRASTIC model. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 3(3), 1–10.

Bauder, T. A. (2014). Groundwater contamination and its effects on water supply. Journal of Water Research, 28(3), 215–230.

Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). The global groundwater crisis. Nature Climate Change, 4(11), 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2425

Fetter, C. W. (2001). Applied hydrogeology (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Foster, S., & Chilton, J. (2003). Groundwater: The processes and pollution sources. Environmental International, 29(2–3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1380

Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. P., & van Beek, L. P. H. (2012). Water balance of global aquifers revealed groundwater footprint. Nature, 488, 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11295

Lee, S. (2003). Evaluation of waste disposal sites using the DRASTIC system in southern Korea. Environmental Geology, 44, 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0803-4

Lerner, D. N. (2002). Identifying and quantifying urban groundwater recharge: A review. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 143–152.

Panagopoulos, G. P., Antonakos, A. K., & Lambrakis, N. J. (2006). Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(6), 894–911.

Siebert, S., Burke, J., Faures, J. M., Frenken, K., Hoogeveen, J., Döll, P., & Portmann, F. T. (2010). Groundwater use for irrigation: A global inventory. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(10), 1863–1880. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010

Velis, M., Conti, K. I., & Biermann, F. (2017). Groundwater and human development: Synergies and trade-offs within the Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Research Letters, 12(10), 104002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa88f1

Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L., & Alley, W. M. (1998). Ground water and surface water: A single resource (U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1139). https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1139/

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

D. Santos, M. C., S. Gaerlan, K. C., S. Palberas, R., C. Pudan, J., & Lubrica, N. (2026). Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using the DRASTIC Method: A Case Study of the Bued River Watershed. Journal of Asian Geography, 5(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2026.5.1.4

Similar Articles

1-10 of 54

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.