Assessing River Care Awareness and Technology Engagement in a Rural Community in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study in Kampung Paya Rawa

Authors

  • Sariana Salleh Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Nur Suhaili Mansor Universiti Utara Malaysia,
  • Hapini Awang Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Fadzliana Razak Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Nurihan Ariffin Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Rahimi Karim Karim Universiti Utara Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2026.5.1.2

Keywords:

River care, Environmental Awareness, community engagement, rural sustainability, rural technology integration

Abstract

This preliminary study examines residents’ awareness of river stewardship and their engagement with technology in Kampung Paya Rawa, a rural community in Mukim Temin, Kedah, Malaysia. Conducted under the Celik Digital, Cakna Kebersihan campaign, the study assesses community knowledge, moral values, sense of responsibility, and technology-related awareness in relation to river conservation. Data were collected through face-to-face surveys with 51 residents over two days in April 2025, enabling direct engagement and a contextual understanding of local perspectives. A descriptive analysis was undertaken to evaluate awareness across the four dimensions. The findings indicate that the community demonstrates a moderate level of awareness in all areas assessed. Residents exhibit a strong emotional and cultural attachment to the river and generally recognise its importance for daily life and environmental sustainability. However, their knowledge of river management, flood risks, and responsible practices remains limited, indicating a gap between general awareness and informed action. Although there is a clear willingness to participate in river care activities, actual engagement appears limited. The study also identifies high smartphone ownership among residents, suggesting considerable potential for integrating digital tools to support environmental education, early warning systems, and community mobilisation, despite only moderate levels of technology-related knowledge. Overall, the findings suggest that combining environmental education with accessible digital initiatives could enhance river stewardship practices in rural communities. This study provides baseline insights to inform future interventions, community-based programmes, and policy-oriented efforts aimed at strengthening sustainable river management through the integration of awareness and technology.

References

Abdul Rahman, H., Dahalan, D., & Abu Bakar, A. S. (2023). Effects of an environmental education intervention on environmental sustainability among youth in Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun.

Ahmad, A., Rahman, S., & Ismail, N. (2020). Environmental knowledge and behavioural intent among rural communities in Malaysia: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Studies, 12(3), 45–60.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Awang, H., Zahurin, M. A., & Wan Rozaini, S. O. (2018). Teacher satisfaction towards the virtual learning environment in Malaysia. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 3(9), 16–25.

Berkes, F. (2009). Community conserved areas: Policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters, 2(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00040.x

Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(6), 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia. (2023). Annual water resources report.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2023). Population and housing census.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

Erwinsyah, E. (2022). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and practices for behaviour change of university students: The case of Indonesia. Journal of STEAM Education, 5(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1075516

Field survey. (2025, April 18–19). Celik Digital, Cakna Kebersihan campaign: River stewardship awareness survey in Kampung Paya Rawa.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

Lye, C. T., Ng, T. H., & Law, J. W. (2024). The role of general and specific pro-environmental education in household waste management in Malaysia: Evidence from quantile regression. Environmental Challenges, Article 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100933

Malaysian Meteorological Department. (2024). Climate of Malaysia.

Raymond, C. M., Bieling, C., Fagerholm, N., Martín-López, B., & Plieninger, T. (2016). The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio, 45(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0

Samsuddin, S. F., Mohamed, N. A., & Bolong, J. (2021). Understanding the digital capabilities of rural communities in low literacy rate areas in Malaysia towards digital society. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(15), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i15/10644

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2015). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.002

Tan, L., & Lee, K. (2019). Emotional connection and conservation behaviour: A study of rural communities in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environmental Science, 8(2), 77–89.

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Yaacob, A. (2023). Environmental education for sustainable development: Knowledge, attitude and practice among primary school teachers. EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), 9(2), 35–42.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Salleh, S. ., Mansor, N. S., Awang, H., Razak, F., Ariffin, N., & Karim, R. K. (2026). Assessing River Care Awareness and Technology Engagement in a Rural Community in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study in Kampung Paya Rawa. Journal of Asian Geography, 5(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.36777/jag2026.5.1.2

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.