Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi Terhadap Keperluan Elemen Teknologi Sebagai Wadah Dalam Pembelajaran Berasaskan Pemikiran Reka Bentuk Application of Fuzzy Delphi method as a Vital Element in Technology as a tool in Design Thinking Based Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
As technology becomes ubiquitous in society, there is increasing momentum to incorporate it into education. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find out the elements needed in integrating technology as a tool for design thinking-based learning. This study is a quantitative study with Fuzzy Delphi method. The data was gathered using questionnaire. Verification is done by 18 experts in the field of education, educational technology and design thinking. The study found that expert consensus on all element is more than 75% with threshold value (d) ≤ 0.2. This suggests that these eight elements are needed in integrating technology as a tool for design thinking-based learning
Apabila teknologi menjadi penting dalam kehidupan masyarakat, terdapat gesaan untuk mengintegrasikan teknologi ke dalam pendidikan. Justeru kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat elemen-elemen yang diperlukan dalam mengintegrasikan teknologi sebagai wadah dalam pembelajaran berasaskan pemikiran reka bentuk. Kajian yang dijalankan ini merupakan satu kajian kuantitatif dengan teknik Fuzzy Delphi. Pendekatan yang digunakan untuk mengumpul data kajian adalah menggunakan instrumen soal selidik. Bilangan pakar yang terlibat adalah seramai 18 orang dalam bidang pendidikan, teknologi pendidikan dan pemikiran reka bentuk. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kelapan-lapan elemen diterima oleh pakar dengan peratus konsensus melebihi 75% dengan nilai ambang (d) ≤ 0.2. Ini menunjukkan bahawa kelapan-lapan elemen ini diperlukan dalam mengintegrasikan teknologi sebagai wadah dalam pembelajaran berasaskan pemikiran reka bentuk.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Baharuddin Aris, Mohamad Bilal Ali, Norah Md. Noor, Mohd. Nihra Haruzuan Muhammad Said, Noor Azean Atan, Manimegalai Subramaniam, & Zaleha Abdullah. (2003). Sains Komputer: Teknik dan teknologi. Selangor: Venton Publishing (M) Sdn Bhd.
Berland, L. K., Martin, T. H., Ko, P., Peacock, S. B., Rudolph, J. J., & Golubski, C. (2013). Student learning in challenge-based engineering curricula. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3(1), 5.
Bodjanova, S. (2006). Median alpha-levels of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.10.015
Boss, S. (2012). Bringing innovation to school: Empowering students to thrive in a changing world. London: Solution Tree Press.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 84–92.
Buchanan, B. G. (2001). Creativity at the metalevel: AAAI-2000 presidential address, AI Magazine, 22(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v22i3.1569
Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P-S. Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C-C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564- 015-9379-4
Chang, P. T., Huang, L. C., & Lin, H. J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00067-0
Chen, C.-T. (2000). Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
Cheng, C.-H., & Lin, Y. (2002). O.R. applications: Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
Chu, H.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2008). A delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems With Applications, 34, 2826–2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., ..., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
Crane, C. M. (2005). Teacher perceived impact o f technology on elementary classrooms and teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti of Missouri. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305456189?accountid=6444 https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/4192
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan. Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1915). Schools of To-morrow. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Doppelt, Y. (2007). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y
Dougherty, L. A. (2015). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(2), 169–171.
Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76(Supplement C), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008
Hartley, A. J. (2014). A mixed methods study exploring the perceived barriers to technology integration among elementary teachers in four elementary schools within a northern Genesee county school district. Retrieved 20 February 2018 from, http://search.proquest.eom/doeview/l705809219?accountid=6444
Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012). Extended professional development in project-based learning: Impacts on 21st century skills teaching and student achievement. Charleston, West Virginia: West Virginia Department of Education.
Jayabalan, L. (2009). Tabiat mencari maklumat menerusi internet dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah di daerah Kluang. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Jones, H., & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. London: Macmillan.
Kelley, D. & Van Patter, G. K. (2005). Design as glue: Understanding the Stanford D. School. NextD Journal Conversation, 21, 1–9.
Kirschner, P. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (Eds.). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning (pp. 1–15). Singapore: Springer.
Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (1998). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah Mat Noh, & Ahmad Ariffin Sapar. (2017). Pengenalan asas kaedah fuzzy delphi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Bangi, Selangor: Minda Intelek Agency.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (2017). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2015). In search of a teacher education curriculum: Appropriating a design lens to solve problems of practice. Educational Technology, 55(6), 3–14.
Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J. A., Ombe, J., & Geen Escoto, M. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method: A Philippine perspective. Ecological Indicators, 93, 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060
Pill, J. (1971). The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Hoboken, NJ: Capstone. Saaty, T. L., & Özdemir, M. S. (2014). How many judges should there be in a group? Annals of Data Science, 1(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-014-0026-4
Sara Jolly, J. (2017). Technology in the montessori classroom: Teachers’ beliefs and technology use. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i1.6458
Taboada, M. B., & Coombs, G. (2013). Liminal moments: Designing, thinking and learning. Paper presented at the Design Learning for Tomorrow–Design Education from Kindergarten to PhD, Oslo, Norway, 14–17 May.
Tang, C.-W., & Wu, C.-T. (2010). Obtaining a picture of undergraduate education quality: A voice from inside the university. Higher Education, 60(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9299-5
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: CA: John Wiley & Sons,.
Wells, A. (2012). The importance of design thinking for technological literacy: A phenomenological perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9207-7
Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press (A Joint Publication with the National Association of Elementary School Principals).