Determinants in the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Teaching among the Philippine Public University Educators: A PLS-SEM Analysis of UTAUT

Main Article Content

Sarah Obsequio Namoco

Abstract

A myriad of studies related to the technology acceptance and use in different organisations have been conducted, but little is known from the perspective of the educators in Philippine public university. To address this gap in literature, this study aims to determine the factors that best influence the use Web 2.0 tools in teaching among educators prior to the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. To investigate this phenomenon, the data of this study was collected from 300 educators in a Philippine public university located in Northern Mindanao through online survey. The hypothesised model was analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation modelling using the SmartPLS software. The data analysis revealed that performance expectancy and effort expectancy are significant determinants while social influence is not a significant determinant of behavioural intention; behavioural intention and facilitating conditions are significant determinants of the use behaviour with 46.9% and 22% explained variance, respectively. The results of the study contribute to further research on the use of Web  2.0 tools among educators investigating the influence of SI towards BI. Further implications and recommendations for future studies are discussed in this study.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Abrahão, R. de S., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F. (2016). Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003

Arif, M., Ameen, K., & Rafiq, M. (2018). Factors affecting student use of Web-based services: Application of UTAUT in the Pakistani context. Electronic Library, 36(3), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2016-0129

Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students’ ICT adoption. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 10(3), 75–86. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059042.pdf

Banas, J. R., & Polly, D. (2016). Instructional design and technology trends in teacher education: An AECT teacher education division special issue of TechTrends. TechTrends, 60(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0007-2

Bhatiasevi, V. (2016). An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking. Information Development, 32(4), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915570764

Bingimlas, K. A. (2017). Learning and teaching with web 2.0 applications in Saudi K-12 schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 99–114. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152646.pdf

Byun, D. H., & Finnie, G. (2011). Evaluating usability, user satisfaction and intention to revisit for successful e-government websites. Electronic Government, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.037694

Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652

Chicioreanu, T. D., Burcea, M., & Wodala, B. (2015). Top 10 – Web 2.0 tools useful in teaching activity. Paper presented at The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for education, National Military Circle, Bucharest, 23–24 April.

Choudhury, N. (2014). World Wide Web and its journey from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(6), 8096–8100. http://www.ijcsit.com/docs/Volume%205/vol5issue06/ijcsit20140506265.pdf

Cohen, J. (1988). The effect size: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, 77–83.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Cruz, Y., Boughzala, I., & Assar, S. (2014). Technology acceptance and actual use with mobile learning: First stage for studying the influence of learning styles on the behavioral intention. Paper presented at the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv, Israel, 9-11 June.

Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomedica, 91(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397

Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., & Badenhorst, J. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 946–967.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived use-fulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

den Exter, K., Rowe, S., Boyd, W., & Lloyd, D. (2012). Using Web 2.0 technologies for Collaborative Learning in Distance Education—Case Studies from an Australian University. Future Internet, 4(1), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4010216

Di Matteo, L. (2021). Global storm: The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and responses around the world. Fraser Institute. Retrieved from https://fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/global-storm-effects-of-COVID-19-pandemic-and-response-around-world.pdf

Durak, H. Y. (2019). Examining the acceptance and use of online social networks by preservice teachers within the context of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 173–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9200-6

Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers‘ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1474904117725899

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In K. Badley (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs (pp. 403–418). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056997115582033

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548

Gold, A. H. A. H. . A. H., Malhotra, A. A. ., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

Gorey, J. (2020). Teaching in a pandemic: How educators are handling the sudden shift to distance learning. Earth Watch. https://earthwatch.org/stories/teaching-pandemic-how-educators-are-handling-sudden-shift-distance-learning

Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sartedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: Evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y

Jamon, B. E. V., Boholano, H. B., Cabanes-Jamon, M. G., & Pardillo, M. F. (2021). Teachers lived experiences in the new normal in Philippine public schools: A phenomenology. International Journal of Research, 08(02), 773–782.

Joreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. Educational Testing Service. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED051257.pdf

Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644

Khanzode, K. C. A., & Sarode, R. D. (2016). Evolution of the World Wide Web: From Web 1.0 to 6.0. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 1(62), 2250–1142. http://www.ijodls.in/uploads/3/6/0/3/3603729/ijodls121.pdf

Kline, R. B. (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today, in the classroom today. The Education Arcade Retrieved, 10(29), 9.

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650

Lemay, D. J., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2021). Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130

Lucero, H. R., Victoriano, J. M., Carpio, J., & Fernando, P. G. (2019). Assessment on e-learning readiness of faculty members and students in the government and private HEI‘s in the Philippines. Paper presented at the fourth Biennial UE CAMANAVA Studies Conference on Quality Education for Sustainable Development, June.

Lye, S. Y., & Churchill, D. (2013). Teaching with technology in a future school in Singapore: A Mathematics teacher’s experience. In L. Y. Tay, & C. P. Lim (Eds.), Creating holistic technology-enhanced learning experiences (pp. 39–58). Sense Publishers.

Markovi?, M. G., Koch, R., & Fran?i?, M. M. (2012). Use of Web 2.0 tools in teaching. Paper presented at the 35th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Hrvatska, 21–25 May.

Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., & Chuah, F. (2017). A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 1(1), i–xiii.

Mohammad-Salehi, B., Vaez-Dalili, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2021). Investigating factors that influence EFL teachers’ adoption of Web 2.0 technologies: Evidence from applying the UTAUT and TPACK. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(1), 1–21.

Moralista, R. B., & Oducado, R. M. F. (2020). Faculty perception toward online education in a state college in the Philippines during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4736–4742. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081044

Mourad, S., & Valette-Florence, P. (2016). Improving prediction with POS and PLS consistent estimations: An illustration. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4675–4684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.057

Nair, P. K., Ali, F., & Leong, L. C. (2015). Factors affecting acceptance & use of ReWIND. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE -02-2015-0001

Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2018). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology and People, 32(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2017-0257

Olea, M. D. (2019). Application of Web 2.0 tools in teaching 21 st-century students. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(1), 1–11.

Palau-Saumell, R., Forgas-Coll, S., Sánchez-García, J., & Robres, E. (2019). User acceptance of mobile apps for restaurants: An expanded and extended UTAUT-2. Sustainability, 11(4), 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041210

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Zimmermann, L. (2011). Customer satisfaction with commercial airlines: The role of perceived safety and purpose of travel. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190407

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. [Software]. https://www.smartpls.com

Robosa, J., Ercie Paras, N., Perante, L., Alvez, T., & Tus, J. (2021). The experiences and challenges faced of the public school teachers amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological study in the Philippines. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 7(1), 1342–1361. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14028833.v1

Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9

Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). SAGE Publications.

Schulz, R., Isabwe, G. M., & Reichert, F. (2015). Ethical issues of gamified ICT tools for higher education. Paper presented at IEEE Conference on e-learning, e-management and e-services (IC3e), Melaka, Malaysia, 24–26 August. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2015.7403481

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–343.

Singh, M. (2018). Adoption of Web 2.0 tools in higher education in India: A study. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(5), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-10-2017-0084

Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335186

Tarhini, A., El-Masri, M., Ali, M., & Serrano, A. (2016). Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers’ acceptance and use of internet banking in Lebanon: A structural equation modeling approach. Information Technology & People, 29(4), 830–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0034

Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Virkus, S., & Bamigbola, A. A. (2013). Educational use of Web 2.0 tools: A phenomenographical study. Information and Society: Proceeding of the Department of Information and Library Studies (pp. 255–264). University of Latvia.

Xia, N., Yang, Y., & Lee, Y. F. (2018). Chinese education in Malaysia under Malaysian ethnic politics. Journal of Politics and Law, 11(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v11n2p23

Xiong, X. (2015). Developing pre-service teachers’ ICT in education competencies in a Chinese Normal University: The role of curriculum leaders (Doctoral Dissertation, The Education University of Hong Kong).

Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Yuen, P. (2011). Perceptions, interest, and use: Teachers and web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 109–123.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom teacher innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 842–515.