Embracing the Challenges of Modular Approach in Teaching in the Time of Pandemic
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was conducted to explore the challenges that college instructors faced during module preparation in this time of pandemic when educational systems around the globe are forced to flex and adjust to the new normal. Mixed methods was used as research design to quantitatively and qualitatively delve into the challenges of college instructors towards preparation of selfpaced learning modules used for teaching in this time of pandemic. Forty-nine instructorrespondents form a Higher Education Institution in the Philippines were selected to participate in the study; they were assigned to teach in various courses, have different length of service, academic preparations and subjects handled. A questionnaire that underwent experts’ validity and reliability test was used as primary instrument to gather quantitative data which were later subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. Qualitative data were gathered through interviews and gave deeper insights on numerical results. Findings revealed that college instructors were dominantly non-education graduates but with Professional Educational Subjects (PES), relatively young in teaching, mostly teaching core/major subjects and have minimal preparations and modules crafted for the current semester. They experienced serious to very serious problems regarding module preparation which challenged and pressured them. Those who were new to the service were better in handling pressure as to meeting deadlines and were more flexible about giving examples in explaining concepts; but those who were veterans were problematic that modules did not undergo instructional material review. Non-education graduates with PES were very particular on the availability or sufficiency of materials for the printing. Those who have more preparations did not find the unavailability or insufficiency of references and making explanations easier to be understood as serious as those who have lesser module preparations. The various problems and challenges that college instructors faced during their preparation of modules in adherence to the government’s directive of non-face-to-face conduct of classes pose a greater challenge for educational systems to assist these teachers by providing sufficient resources, technologies and tools; proper training and a sort of expressive emotional reinforcement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Agsalud, P. (2016). Teaching effectiveness of the Teacher Education faculty members in Pangasinan State University, Asingan Campus, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 16–22. http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/APJMR-2017.5.1.03.pdf
Akamai. (2017). Akamai’s State of the Internet. Akamai, 10(1). https://www.akamai.com/us/en/multimedia/documents/state-of-the-internet/q1-2017-state-of-theinternet-connectivity-report.pdf
Ali, R., Ghazi, S., Khan, M., Hussain, S., & Faitma, Z. (2010). Effectiveness of Modular teaching in Biology at secondary level. Asian Social Science, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n9p49
American Psychological Association. (2012). Stress by generation. Retrieved 12 October, 2020 from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2012/generations
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. New York: Paglave Macmillan
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press.
Boudersa, N. (2016). The importance of teachers” training and professional development programs in the Algerian education context: Toward informed and effective teaching process, Expériences Pédagogiques. http://exp-pedago.ens-oran.dz
Cheng, C. M., & Abu Bakar, M. B. (2013). The impact of using modules in the teaching and learning of English in Malaysian Polytechnics: An analysis of the views and perceptions of English language lecturers. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.32
CHED (Commission on Higher Education) (2020a). CHED COVID-19 Advisory No. 1. https://ched.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/CHED-COVID-2019-Advisory-No.-1.pdf
CHED. (2020b). CHED COVID-19 Advisory No. 3. https://ched.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/CHED-COVID-2019-Advisory-No.-3.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
Dahar, M., & Faize, F. (2011). Effect of the availability and the use of instructional materials on academic performance of students in Punjab (Pakistan). Middle Eastern Finance and Economics Issue11.
Dejene, W. (2019). The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052
Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). Modular Distance Learning: Here’s what you need to know. https://www.whatalife.ph/modular-distance-learning-heres-what-you-need-to-know/.
Dogruer, N., Eyyam, R., & Menevis, I. (2011). The use of internet for educational purposes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.115
Geladze, D. (2015). Using the internet and computer technologies in learning/teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ108835.pdf
Jones, N. (2019). Improving internet access in the Philippines. San Francisco, CA: Asian Foundation.
Kim, J. (2020). Teaching and learning after COVID-19. Inside higher ed. Retrieved 6 October 2020, from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/learning-innovation/teaching-and-learning-after-covid-19
Larawan, L. (2013). Acceptability of teacher-made modules in production management. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), 1(2), 10–22.
Malik, K. (2012). Effects of modular and traditional approaches on students’ general comprehension. Elixir Social Studies, 42, 6228–6231.
Manlove, D., & David, B. (1985). Flexible scheduling. New York: Longmans Green and Company.
Martin, K. (1997). Connecting instruction and management in a student-centered classroom. Middle School Journal, 28(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1997.11494456
MOE [Ministry of Education]. (2013). A revised guide line for curriculum modularization in Ethiopian higher education institutions. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Author.
Moore, S. & Panter, J. (2015). An introduction to module design. AISHE Academic Practice Guides. https://www.aishe.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/3-Module-Design.pdf
Mupa, P. & Chinooneka, T. (2015). Factors contributing to ineffective teaching and learning in primary schools: why are schools in decadence? Journal of Educational Practice, 6(19), 125–133. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079543.pdf
Mirkholikovna, D. K. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. ????? ? ??????????? ???????, 7(54), 70–72.
Reddy, M. (2008). Importance of course module in academic performance of students at university level: (A Case of Year II Technology and science Faculty students-Jimma University). Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 1(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesc.v1i1.41986
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction, research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Rosenshine.pdf
Torrefranca, E. C. (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1), 43–73.
Sadiq, S. & Samir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of modular approach in teaching at university level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103–110.
Salandanan, G. G. (2012). Teaching and the teacher. Lorimar Publishing, Inc. Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. Haribapa Arts and Commerce College.
Simbulan, N. (2020). The Philippines – COVID-19 and its impact on higher education in the Philippines. The HEAD Education. https://headfoundation.org/2020/06/04/covid-19-and-its-impact-on-higher-education-in-the-philippines/
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2010). ‘Teach as you preach’: The effects of student? centred versus lecture?based teaching on student teachers’ approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903457818
Tate, J., Schubert, C. & Mccoy, C. (2014). Understanding modular learning – Developing a strategic plan to embrace change. I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 9(4), 32–44.
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
UNESCO (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. Retrieved 25 September 2020, from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
United Nations. (2020). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-education-during-covid-19-and-beyond
Valencia, R. (2020). Modular approach in teaching science 10. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 4(3), 99–106. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30318.pdf
World Health Organization. (2020). COVID-19 strategy update. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-strategy-update-14april2020.pdf?sfvrsn=29da3ba0_6