A Challenge of Online Teaching and Learning Pedagogy: Fundamental English Writing Class in a Thai Context
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2019-2021, most teaching and learning classes in Thailand were conducted through online platforms, including the fundamental English writing course for the non-English-majoring undergraduate students. This paper aims to shed light on how the undergraduates perceive themselves while experiencing the online fundamental English writing class. In addition, this study explores students’ learning performance through results drawn from writing assignments and tests, including the learners’ reflections on their improvement in English writing. The research also examines specific factors that fostered students’ satisfactory learning outcomes throughout the online learning period. A mixed-method approach, comprising quantitative and qualitative strategies, was applied in seeking answers to the research questions. The analysis and interpretation of research data involved transforming qualitative themes or codes into numbers to triangulate the quantitative outcomes and interpreting them to explain phenomena emerging from the study. The findings suggest that students were content with the teaching and learning strategies employed throughout the course. They perceived they could improve their English writing skills and earn additional benefits from the designed online course compared with traditional in-class learning. The results of this research on the first-hand experience could be utilised as a guideline in preparing an online class, developing learning materials, and adopting or adapting helpful teaching strategies to deliver the fundamental English writing class through the online platform efficiently.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aasa O. (2016). Likert scales: Analyses and methods. Delightsome Consultants. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343017856_Analyses_and_methods_for_Likert_scale_data
Alsaleem, B. I. A. (2014). The effect of “WhatsApp” electronic dialogue journaling on improving writ-ing vocabulary word choice and voice of EFL undergraduate Saudi Students. Harvard: 21st Century Academic Forum Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson782/Rubric.pdf
Astaman, A. (2009). Motivating the reluctant language learner. Retrieved 7 February 2011 from http://lanacometorich.blogspot.com/2009/07/motivating-reluctantlanguagelearner.html
Babacan, N., & Gunuc, S. (2017). Technology integration in english language teaching and learning. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 5(2), 349–358.
Bangkok Biz News. (2021). Learning Online with “Not Ready” Thai Families: Where Thai education goes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/880578
Bangkok Post. (2017). Bangkok traffic jams among world’s worst. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/advanced/1201724/bangkoktraffic-jams-among-worlds-worst
Bradford, A. (2007). Motivational orientations in under-researched FLL contexts. Journal of Language, 38(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688207085849
Center of COVID-19 Situation Administration (CCSA). (2021). COVID-19 situation update in Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.moiCOVID.com/06/08/2021/uncategorized/4502/
Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Arkansas Tech University. Cote Parra, E. (2015). Engaging foreign language learners in a Web 2.0- Mediated collaborative learning process. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 17(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n2.47510
Crane, E. (2012). Using Web 2.0 and social networking tools in the K-12 classroom. Chicago: American Library Association.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Disli, Ö. (2012). Improving writing skills through supplementary computerassisted activities. Gazi University.
Donaldson, L. (2014). Integrating web 2.0 learning technologies in higher education: The necessity, the barriers and the factors for success. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 6(3), 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.culi.chula.ac.th
Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualising motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40(1). 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00954.x
Gardner, R. C. (2006). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition (2nd ed., Vol. 10). New York: Peter Lang. Hendricks, A.B. (1997). Predicting student success with the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Retrieved 5 May 2011 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B9853-5016P5K-11G-1&_cdi=59087&_user=10&_pii=S1877042810008335&_origin=&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2010&_sk=999979997&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlzzSkzk&md5=1ceb56e7b7bdaa626 3d8ac5dcec3b8e9&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
Hewstone, M., Fincham, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. F. (1983). Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions. London: Academic Press.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
Huba, M & J. Freed. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Inkaew, M. (2020). An analysis of EFL Students’ perceptions and motivations towardsfundamental English writing learning: A comparative study of classes conducted by native English instructors and Thai teachers in a Thai classroom context. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 22(4), 16–36.
Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2020). Online Language Learning for Thai EFL Learners: An Analysis of Effective Alternative Learning Methods in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak. English Language Teaching, 13(12), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n12p15
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2021). Online teaching policy. Retrieved from https://www.mhesi.go.th/images/Pusit2021/pdfs/CCF_000006.pdf
Mofareh, A. A. (2019). The use of technology in English language teaching. Frontiers in Education Technology, 2(3), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v2n3p168
Ngo, H., Spooner-Lane, R. & Mergler, A. (2017) A comparison of motivation to learn English between English major and non-English major students in a Vietnamese University. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1094076
Online Teaching Tools and Resources. (2015). Yale Centre for Language Study. Retrieved from https://cls.yale.edu/faculty/resources/online-teaching-tools-and-resources
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
Petric, B. (2002). Students’ attitudes towards writing and the development of academic writing skills. The Writing Center Journal, 22(2), 9–27.
Parvin, R. H., & Salam, S. F. (2015). The effectiveness of using technology in English language classrooms in government primary schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.18275/fire201502011049
Patel, C. (2013). Use of multimedia technology in teaching and learning communication skill: An analysis. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(7), 116–123. Retrieved from http://www.ijoart.org/docs/Use-of-MultimediaTechnology-in-Teaching-and-Learning-communication-skill.pdf
Sa?lamel, Hasan & Kayao?lu, Mustafa. (2015). English major students’ perceptions of academic writing: A struggle between writing to learn and learning to write. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v4i3.477
Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2007). Self-regulated strategy development: A validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 1–20.
Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222421
Srisatidnarakul, B. (2007). Research methodology: Ways to success (2nd ed.). Bangkok. U&I Intermedia.
Turgut, F. & Kayaoglu, N. M. (2015). Using rubrics as an instructional tool in EFL writing courses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(1). 47-58.
Warden, C. A., & Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of Integrative Motivation in an Asian EFL Setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb01997.x
Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2012). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online and Blended Learning. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from https://kpk12.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPace2012.pdf
Wahyudi, A. (2017). The English learning motivation and attitude towardsEnglish of D3 Nursing science students in Palembang, South Sumatra. English Community Journal 1(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v1i1.651
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45 (2010), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433596
Wilson, M. (2007). Why I won’t be using rubrics to respond to students’ writing. The English Journal, 96(4), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047167
Xiao, Y., Liang, Z. L., Li, Q., & Jia, R. J. (2017). Exploring the feasibility of videomediated listening test in a Nation-wide proficiency English examination in china. TESOL International Journal, 12(2), 1–16. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247808