Predictors of Student Engagement in Science Learning: The Role of Science Laboratory Learning Environment and Science Learning Motivation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Student engagement is one of the indicators of a successful teaching and learning process. Many studies claim that student engagement is associated with the performance and achievement of students. In this study, the researchers aimed to determine the effects of science laboratory environments and science learning motivation towards student engagement in learning science among non-science students. 468 upper secondary non-science students in Sarawak were involved in this survey with the administration of three sets of questionnaires on science laboratory environment, science learning motivation and student engagement in science learning. Multiple regression was used to analyse the research questions. Both science laboratory learning environment (r = 0.523) and science learning motivation (r = 0.670) are found positively correlated to student engagement. The results also revealed that the science laboratory learning environment and science learning motivation are significant predictors of student engagement in learning science with R2 = 0.463. Specifically, student cohesiveness, open-endedness, integration and material environment in the science laboratory learning environment and all the dimensions of motivation predict student engagement in science learning. The findings suggest that educators, especially science teachers, should utilise the laboratory effectively and keep students motivated to ensure their active engagement in science learning
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2013). Lack of interest in school science among non-science students at the senior high school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 53(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/13.53.07
Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018- 7_13
Akinbobola, A. O., & Afolabi, F. (2010). Analysis of Science process skills in West African senior secondary school certificate Physics practical examinations in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 5, 234–240.
Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science laboratory environment and academic performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(6), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9072-4
Appleton, J., Christenson, S., & Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bircan, H. S., & Sungur, S. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in science achievement. Science Education International, 27, 509–529.
Brislin, R. W. (1976).Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207597608247359
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Kamisah Osman, & Lilia Halim (2010). Hubungan ramalan persekitaran pembelajaran makmal sains dengan tahap kepuasan pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 19–30.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman-Young, S., Spangers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (pp. 1099–1120). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Dunlop, C. S. M. (2004). Perceptions of the learning environment, attitudes towards science, and understandings of the nature of science among prospective elementary teachers in an innovative science course. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Curtin University Technology.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Faizatul Farhana Farush Khan (2020). Hanya 19 peratus pilih aliran Sains. Berita Harian, 29 May.
Fleming, J., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2018). Methodologies, methods and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning. International Journal of WorkIntegrated Learning, Special Issue, 19, 205–213.
Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
Fraser, B. J., Mc Robbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. (1993). Development and cross national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science. Science Education, 77, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770102
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. H. (2005). School engagement. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Fredricks, J., Bluemenfeld, P. & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gibson, H. L. C., C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
Green, M., & Piel, J. A. (2009). Theories of human development: A comparative approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Gunuc, S. & Kuzu, A. 2014. Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
Gupta, A., Koul, R., & Sharma, M. (2015). Assessing the science laboratory learning environments at the senior secondary level in an Indian school. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2015.00001.X
Hofstein, A., Nahum, T.L., Shore, R. (2001). Assessment of the learning environment of inquiry-type laboratories in high school chemistry. Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012467417645
Hsieh. T. L. & Yu, P. (2022) Exploring achievement motivation, student engagement, and learning outcomes for STEM college students in Taiwan through the lenses of gender differences and multiple pathways, Research in Science and Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1983796
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43, 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387
Jimerson, S., Campos, E., & Greif, J. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075
Karpudewan, M., & Chong, K. M. (2017). The effects of classroom learning environment and laboratory learning environment on the attitude towards learning science in the 21st-century science lessons. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), Special issue on Graduate Students Research on Education, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.2017.7795
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Law, H. H., Sharif, S., & Han, C. G. K. (2021). Instrumen penglibatan pembelajaran sains: analisis kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(40), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.640018
Law, H. H., Sharif, S., & Han, C. G. K. (2022). Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1714–1724. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22304
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46, 517–528.
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B., Matjasko, J., & Farb, A. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45–63). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_3
Mai, M. Y. M., Muhammed Yusof, & Maria Saleh. (2015). Motivation and engagement as a predictor of students’ science achievement satisfaction of Malaysian secondary school students. International Education Studies, 2(4), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.26417/623oeo47r
Martin, A. J. (2013). Improving the achievement, motivation, and engagement of students with ADHD: the role of personal best goals and other growth-based approaches. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 23, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2013.4
Morse, A. B., Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Promoting school completion. Principal Leadership, 4(6), 9–13.
Mullis I. V. S., Martin M. O., Foy P., Kelly D. L., Fishbein B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
Nayir, F. (2017). The Relationship between student motivation and class engagement levels. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(71), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.71.4
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263
Parappilly, M., Siddiqui, S., Zadnik, M., Shapter, J., & Schmidt, L. (2013). An inquiry-based approach to laboratory experiences: investigating students’ ways of active learning. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 21(5), 42–53.
Peng, C. (2021). The academic motivation and engagement of students in English as a foreign language classes: Does teacher praise matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 778174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174
Pilotti, M., Anderson, S., Hardy, P., Murphy, P., & Vincent, P. (2017). Factors related to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement in the online asynchronous classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 145–153.
Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Christenson S., Reschly A., Wylie C. (Eds)., Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018- 7_7
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wenzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). Routledge.
Ryan, E., & Deci, E. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sarstedt, M. & Mooi, E. A. (2014). A concise guide to market research. The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53965-7
Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E.S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2
Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S.M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R.F., Sinha, S. & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003
Shernoff, D., Tonks, S. & Anderson, B. (2014). The impact of the learning environment on student engagement in high school classrooms. Teachers College Record, 116(13), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601315
Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from Check & Connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340894
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Sufean Hussin & Norliza Zakuan. (2009). Modal insan. 60:40 dalam sains dan teknologi. Kuala Lumpur: Tinta Publishers.
Tas, Y. (2016). The contribution of perceived classroom learning environment and motivation to student engagement in science. European Journal of Psychology Education, 31, 557– 577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0303-z
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407308475
Velayutham, S., & Aldridge, J. M. (2013). Influence of psychosocial classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Science Education, 43, 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y
Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J. M. & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159–2179. https://doi.org/10.10 80/09500693.2010.541529
Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J.M. & Fraser, B. (2012). Gender differences in student motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A multi-group structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1347– 1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9339-y
Wigfield, A., & Wagner, A. L. (2005). Competence, motivation, and identity development during adolescence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 222–239). Guilford Publications.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Wang, Y., Qiao, D. & Chui, E. (2017). Student engagement matters: A self-determination perspective on Chinese MSW students’ perceived competence after practice learning. British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx015
Wong, F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514960140107
Wrutheran, S., Alyas Mohamad, Rohani Hamid & Wan Mazlan Wan Muda. (2001). Amali sains dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains teras di kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat. Jurnal Penyelidikan, 2(4).