Revealing Preservice Teachers' Conceptions, Troublesome Knowledge and Threshold Concept of Chemical Equilibrium through Predict Observe Explain Mental Model Diagnostic Test (POE-MMDT)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to reveal preservice teacher’ conception of chemical equilibrium concepts which then were further analysed to identify the troublesome knowledge and threshold concept of chemical equilibrium. The participants of this study were 68 preservice chemistry teachers from one of the Teacher Education Institutions in Bandung, Indonesia. Using the descriptive-qualitative design, this research uses a predict-observe-explain mental model diagnostic test consisting of four main questions related to the phenomenon equilibrium process of the decomposition of N2O4 to become NO2. The findings show that most of the preservice teachers’ conceptions about chemical equilibrium are at the level of partial understanding, with five misconceptions has been identified in this study: (1) the reaction in chemical equilibrium is the same as an irreversible reaction; (2) the concentration of reactant and products are the same at equilibrium state; (3) gas with a greater concentration at equilibrium state can be determined from the gas that was first inserted to the container; (4) the concentration ratio at equilibrium is equal with the ratio of the coefficient reaction, and (5) the reactant is the gas which fills the container first. Further analysis shows that there are eight concepts in chemical equilibrium with troublesome knowledge characteristics, namely (1) the concentration of reactants and products in a state of equilibrium; (2) changes in the concentration of reactants and products to a state of equilibrium when starting from any side; (3) reactions that occur in an equilibrium state, (4) chemical equations for equilibrium reaction; (5) the rate of reactions in equilibrium state; (6) the change of reaction rate to reach an equilibrium state; (7) the relationship between Q and K; and (8) the calculation of reactants and products concentration at an equilibrium state. In addition, chemical equilibrium has two threshold concepts: the dynamic characteristic of equilibrium reaction and equilibrium constant. These findings show that the predict-observe-explain instrument has the potential to disclose PSTs’ mental model since it requires the participants to explain the prediction and its corresponding observation result. Besides, this instrument also guides the participants in explaining the macroscopic phenomena, which generates information about their understanding at the submicroscopic and symbolic levels. should be recognised as encompassed by and a form or part of “for all.”
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abd Halim, N. D., Ali, M. B., Yahaya, N., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2013). Mental model in learning chemical bonding: A preliminary study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.226
Akaygun, S. (2016). Is the oxygen atom static or dynamic? The effect of generating animations on students’ mental models of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 788–807. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00067C
Chittleborough, G. D., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2002). Constraints to the development of first year university chemistry students’ mental models of chemical phenomena. Teaching and Learning Forum 2002: Focusing on the student, 43–50.
Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90035F
Davies, P. (2003). Threshold concepts: How can we recognise them?. In H.F. Meyer, & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 70–84). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966273
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. The European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070211
Hill, S. (2019). The difference between troublesome knowledge and threshold concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1619679
Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding mental models of dilution in Thai students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(2), 147–168.
Karpudewan, M., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Investigating high school students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(6), 845– 863. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.280a
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning diversity and inclusivity (pp. 53–64). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Lin, H. S., Cheng, H. J., & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The assessment of students and teachers’ understanding of gas laws. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p235
Loertscher, J., Green, D., Lewis, J. E., Lin, S., & Minderhout, V. (2014). Identification of threshold concepts for biochemistry. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-04-0066
Mensah, A., & Morabe, O. N. (2018). Strategies used by grade 12 physical sciences students in solving chemical equilibrium problems. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1475908
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Teaching and Learning Research Programme Project, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Orgill, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perceptions of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806229N
Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
Park, E. J., & Light, G. (2009). Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701675880
Raviolo, A. (2001). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 629. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p629
Sendur, G., Toprak, M., & Pekmez, E. S. (2011). How can secondary school students perceive chemical equilibrium?. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(2), 1512–1531. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsaedu/issue/19820/212081
Sesen, B. A. (2013). Diagnosing preservice science teachers’ understanding of chemistry concepts by using computer-mediated predict–observe–explain tasks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20143K
Sunyono, S., Leny, Y., & Muslimin, I. (2015). Supporting students in learning with multiple representation to improve student mental models on atomic structure concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104–125. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064043.pdf
Supasorn, S. (2015). Grade 12 students’ conceptual understanding and mental model of galvanic cell before and after learning by using small-scale experiments in conjunction with a model kit. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 393– 407. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00247D
Talanquer, V. (2015). Threshold concepts in chemistry: the critical role of implicit schemas. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500679k
Thomas, P. L., & Schwenz, R. W. (1998). College physical chemistry students’ conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10%3C1151::AID-TEA6%3E3.0.CO;2-K
Taber, K. S. (2008). Exploring conceptual integration in student thinking: Evidence from a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1915–1943. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701589404
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and instruction, 4(1), 4–-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
Voska, K. W., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2%3C160::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-M
Wang, C. Y., & Barrow, L. H. (2013). Exploring conceptual frameworks of models of atomic structures and periodic variations, chemical bonding, and molecular shape and polarity: A comparison of undergraduate general chemistry students with high and low levels of content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20116J
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761342