Charting the Southeast Asian Science Teachers’ Challenges into Recommendations for Future Online Regional Courses

Main Article Content

Zainun Mustafa
Deva Nanthini Sinniah
Nelson Cyril
Sharfuddin Abdul Syukor
Sivaranjini Sinniah

Abstract

The regional courses for science teachers in Southeast Asia (SEA) offer participants with the inservice knowledge and skills while promoting deliberate discussions about recent issues related to teaching profession and the sharing of best practices in science education. A total of 21 teachers from eight SEA countries were purposefully selected to participate in this course as nominated by their respective education ministerial officers. Given that the participants came from different countries and attended the course virtually for four weeks, this article aims to chart participants’ insights to be backed as data for future course facilitation. The findings are based on post-course evaluation garnered from 21 unstructured essays provided by participants with a focus on two key aspects: (1) the challenges that participants encountered prior to or during the courses, and (2) a recommendation for a similar course in future. Five challenges emerged from the findings include; English proficiency, socio-cultural preferences in social activities, digital technology access and skills, time and schedule constraints, and institutional challenges. In terms of recommendations, participants shared their thoughts on how to better facilitate and manage course administration. Since the majority of professional development courses are held at the national level, this study helped to consolidate country differences and served as the foundation of evidence for future courses that will adapt similar region-based online participations.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, U. (2017). Investing in teacher learning: In-service teacher professional training in Indonesia. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 18(1), 65–78.

Acharya, A. (1998). Culture, security, multilateralism: The ‘ASEAN way’ and regional order. Contemporary Security Policy, 19(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523269808404179

ASEAN. (2015). Kuala Lumpur declaration on a people-oriented, people-centered ASEAN https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/26th-KUALA-LUMPURDECLARATION-ON-A-PEOPLE-ORIENTED-PEOPLE-CENTREDASEAN-Final.pdf

Ayvaz-Tuncel, Z., & Cobanoglu, F. (2018). In-service teacher training: Problems of the teachers as learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11411a

Bayrakc?, M. (2009). In-service teacher training in Japan and Turkey: A comparative analysis of institutions and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n1.2

Biasutti, M., Frate, S., & Concina, E. (2019). Music teachers’ professional development: Assessing a three-year collaborative online course. Music Education Research, 21(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1534818

Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39(3), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.009

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009

Byrne, M. (2001). Sampling for qualitative research. AORN Journal, 73(2), 494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61990-X

Chaghari, M., Saffari, M., Ebadi, A., & Ameryoun, A. (2017). Empowering education: A new model for in-service training of nursing staff. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(1), 26.

Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners’ experiences of starting an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1604_2

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.

Devadason, R. P. (2017). Improving Basic science and mathematics education in Southeast Asia: The role of SEAMEO RECSAM. In Science education: A global perspective (pp. 125–143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_7

Flatau, P., Zaretzky, K., Adams, S., Horton, A., & Smith, J. (2015). Measuring outcomes for impact in the community sector in Western Australia. Bankwest Foundation Social Impact Series, 1, 1–24.

Fughlister, K. (2012). Where does learning take place? The role of intergovernmental cooperation in policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 316–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02000.x

Gunel, M., & Tanriverdi, K. (2014). In-service teacher training from international and national perspectives: The retention and loss of institutional and academic memories. TED E??T?M VE B?L?M, 39(175). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.2949

Habana, P. I. (1993). Building scenarios for education in South-east Asia. Futures, 25(9), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90063-Y

Jamil, H., Razak, N. A., Raju, R., & Mohamed, A. R. (2011). Teacher professional development in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. Paper presented at The Africa-Asia University Dialogue for Educational Development Report of the International Experience Sharing Seminar: Actual Status and Issues of Teacher Professional Development, 85–102.

Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2019). The Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018: June 2019. [Research Brief ], UCL Institute of Education.

Junejo, M. I., Sarwar, S., & Ahmed, R. R. (2018). Impact of in-service training on performance of teachers a case of STEVTA Karachi region. International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies, 2(2), 50–60.

Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2007). Teachers’ in?service training needs in Cyprus. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760701275487

Limcaco, E. R. (1988). SEAMEO member countries adapt distance learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(88)90004-1

Loughran, J. (2006). Towards a better understanding of science teaching. Teaching Education, 17(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210600680317

Low, E.-L., & Hashim, A. (2012). English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy and language in use. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42

Makrakis, V. (2014). Transforming university curricula towards sustainability: A EuroMediterranean initiative. In Handbook of research on pedagogical innovations for sustainable development (pp. 619–640). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5856-1.ch032

Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3

Murcia, K., & Pepper, C. (2018). Evaluating the social impact of a science centre’s STEM professional learning strategies for teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 438–452.

Neupane, B. P., & Joshi, D. N. (2022). Perspectives on teacher education in South Asia: A comparative review. The Harvest, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3126/harvest.v1i1.44333

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

OECD. (1998). Staying Ahead. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264163041-en

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Sayed, Y., & Badroodien, A. (2016). Teachers and social cohesion in the Global South: Expanding the notion of education quality. Education as Change, 20(3), 1–14.

SEAMEO Secretariat. (2021). SEAMEO strategic plan 2021–2035. Retrieve from https://apa.sdg4education2030.org/sites/apa.sdg4education2030.org/files/2021-09/SEAMEO%20Strategic%20Plan%202021%E2%80%932030.pdf

Smith, P. K. (2010). Professional development of teacher educators. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), Encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 676–680). Oxford: Academic Press.

Ulla, M. B., & Winitkun, D. (2018). In-service teacher training program in Thailand: Teachers’ beliefs, needs, and challenges. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(3), 1579–1594.

United Nation. (2022). Teacher, teaching and the teaching profession. Transforming Education Summit. Retrieved from https://transformingeducationsummit.sdg4education2030.org/AT3DiscussionForum

Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010

Vrasidas, C., & Zembylas, M. (2004). Online professional development: Lessons from the field. Education+ Training, 46(6/7), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410555231

Vukelich, C., & Wrenn, L. C. (1999). Quality professional development: What do we think we know? Childhood Education, 75(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1999.10522003

Yamada, S. (2016). Asian regionality and post-2015 consultation: Donors’ self-images and the discourse. In Post-education-forall and sustainable development paradigm: structural changes with diversifying actors and norms (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 29, pp. 143–209), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000029015

Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. issues & answers. REL2007–No. 033. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education.