The Impact of Image-Driven Stimuli on Malaysian Young Learners’ Receptive and Productive Vocabulary
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Malaysia’s present scenario, competency in English is not a surety despite it being part of the curriculum from the very start of primary education. In view of the importance of lexical knowledge in language development and the hypothesised superiority of pictorial stimuli, the present study tested the effectiveness of an image-driven intervention for receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge development among Malaysian Year 1 students. A quasi-experimental design was utilised, involving Experimental and Control groups (totalling 159 participants). Three tiers of testing were administered – pre-testing, post-testing to measure for recall, and delayed post-testing for retention. The Experimental group experienced five image driven sessions designed for lexical development (one session per week, 30 minutes per session). The Control group was not accorded the same treatment. Approximately 90% of the participants belonged to the B40 (Bottom 40%) group – the group with the lowest income level in Malaysia. Despite the lack of statistical significance, our findings on the whole show development with respect to the participants’ lexical knowledge after experiencing the image-driven intervention, with raw scores clearly indicating receptive and productive vocabulary improvement at both the recall and retention stages. The study’s findings extend the current knowledge base, especially within the Malaysian domain which suffers from an unfortunate lack of similar studies focusing on lower primary learners. Also, the results appear promising (with only five treatment sessions) and pave the way for more research concerning the effectiveness of the intervention among young ESL/EFL learners.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alemi, M., & Tayebi, A. (2011). The influence of incidental and intentional vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary strategy use on learning L2 vocabularies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.81-98
Amrhein, P. C., McDaniel, M. A., & Waddill, P. (2002). Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: Do pictures provide privileged access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(5), 843–857. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.843
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. K. (2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Cengage. Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), The handbook of reading research (pp. 789–814). New York: Longman. Biemiller, A. (2010). Vocabulary development and implications for reading problems. In A. McGill-Franzen, & R. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disabilities research (pp. 208–218). New York: Routledge. Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. London: Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.2307/1292061
Calhoun, E. F. (1999). Teaching beginning reading and writing with the Picture Word Inductive Model. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Campbell, J. (2018). English language and an inclusive Malaysia. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 206–219. https://doi. org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-15
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. D. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Defeyter, M. A., Russo, R., & McPartlin, P. L. (2009). The picture superiority effect in recognition memory: A developmental study using the response signal procedure. Cognitive Development, 24(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.05.002
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Diem, K. G. (2002). Using research methods to evaluate your extension program. Journal of Extension, 40(6). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2002december/a1.php
Ensor, T. M., Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2019). Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical distinctiveness account. Memory & Cognition, 47, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0858-9
Eyckmans, J. (2004). Measuring receptive vocabulary size: Reliability and validity of the yes/no vocabulary test for French-speaking learners of Dutch. Volume 91 of LOT: LOT (Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalkunde), Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Fitzpatrick, T., & Clenton, J. (2010). The challenge of validation: Assessing the performance of a test of productive vocabulary. Language Testing, 27(4), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209354771
Fricker, R. D., Burke, K., Han, X., & Woodall, W. H. (2019). Assessing the statistical analyses used in basic and applied social psychology after their p-value ban. The American Statistician, 73(S1), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1537892
Gonzalez, R. A., & Piriz, A. M. P. (2016). Measuring the productive vocabulary of secondary school CLIL students: Is Lex30 a valid test for low-level school learners? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 31–54.
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23–59.
Jiang, X. (2014). Vocabulary learning through use of the Picture Word Inductive Model for young English learners in China: A mixed methods examination using cognitive load theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
Jiang, X. (2015). Exploring seventh graders’ perceptions of the Picture Word Inductive Model in their English narrative writing in China. In S. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual South Florida Education Research Conference (pp. 76–84), Miami, Florida.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E.F. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Kashinathan, S., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2021). ESL learners’ challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 10(2), 983–991. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10355
Khamis, N., & Ho Abdullah, I. (2018). What do different word lists reveal about the lexical features of a specialised language? 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-03
Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202– 213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349
Lee, B. C., Pandian, A., & Rethinasamy, S. (2020). Recall and retention of vocabulary depth of young learners via PWIM. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(S2), 297–319.
Lee, B. C., Pandian, A., Rethinasamy, S., & Tan, D. A. L. (2019). Effects of PWIM in the ESL classroom: Vocabulary knowledge development among primary Malaysian learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(4), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2504-11
Masoumi, G. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2020). Impact of test format on vocabulary test performance of EFL learners: The role of gender. Language Testing in Asia, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00099-x
Masrai, A. (2019). Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: Evidence for high-, mid- and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–13. https:// doi.org/10.1177/2158244019845182
Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2018). Measuring the contribution of academic and general vocabulary knowledge to learners’ academic achievement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.006
Mayer, J. R. (2012). Effects of using the concept attainment model with inductive reasoning with high school biology students. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Montana State University.
McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2014). Effects of vocabulary instruction on measures of language processing: Comparing two approaches. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.06.002
McQuirter-Scott, R. (2010). What works? Research into practice. Ontario: The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.
Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University College Swansea.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meara, P. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.24
Meara, P., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Lex 30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00058-5
Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. In D. Albrechtsen, K. Haastrup, & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Angles on the English-speaking world 4 (pp. 85–96). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Ministry of Education (MOE), Malaysia (2016). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/en/moe-staff/education-services-officer/dskp
Mochida, A., & Harrington, M. (2006). The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 23(1), 73–98. https://doi. org/10.1191/0265532206lt321oa Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House. Nation, P. (1997). Bring today’s vocabulary research into tomorrow’s classrooms. In G. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classrooms of tomorrow: Issues and responses (pp. 170–182). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nation, P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656
Nemati, A. (2010). Enhancing long-term retention by memory vocabulary learning strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.4314/marang.v20i1.56821
Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.
Neuman, S. B., & Kaefer, T. (2018). Developing low-income children’s vocabulary and content knowledge through a shared book reading program. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.001
Nurani, S., & Rosyada, A. (2017). Implemented PWIM in developing students’ communicative competence: SMK Islam Wijaya Kusuma Jakarta. Lingua Cultura, 11(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v11i1.1608
Paivio, A. D. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Privitera, G. J. (2012). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. California: Sage. Read, J. (2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 105–125.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In H. Spinnler, & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.
Shen, Z. (2008). The roles of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in EFL reading performance. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n12p135
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
Strauber, C. B., Sorcar, P., Howlett, C., & Goldman, S. (2020). Using a picture-embedded method to support acquisition of sight words. Learning and Instruction, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101248
Sukardjo, M., & Salam, M. (2020). Effect of concept attainment models and self directed learning (SDL) on mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13319a
Tan, D. A. L. (2016a). Investigating guided extensive reading and vocabulary knowledge performance among remedial ESL learners in a public university in Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
Tan, D. A. L. (2016b). Trends in second/foreign language teaching and learning: The position assigned to the learning of lexis over the years. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.84
Tan, D. A. L., Lee, B. C., Adi Kasuma, S. A., & Ganapathy, M. (2020). Picture superiority effect: Using images for vocabulary enhancement among year one Malaysian ESL learners. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(S2), 177–196.
Townsend, D., Filippini, A., Collins, P., & Biancarosa, G. (2012). Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/663301
Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2016). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1141030
Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 540–556. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362168818799371
Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197030
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13–40. https:// doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13
Yuksel, H. G., & Kavanoz, S. (2010). Does vocabulary knowledge distinguish among proficiency levels of Turkish university students? International Journal of Learning, 17(5), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i05/47071