Teacher Leadership Interrogates Teaching Policy: Comparing the Voices of Low-Income Schools with National Teacher Policies in Argentina
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyses how low-income schools and teacher education policies in Argentina describe the idealised “good” teacher. One of the crucial foundations of teacher leadership is related to teachers’ professional abilities. This study aims to problematise the fragile discursive constructions of what counts as effective and good teaching in both low-income schools' actors and teacher education policy documents. As previous research has confirmed teacher ability is contextual and a highly controversial topic. How low-income school actors describe, interpret and enact good teaching might differ from national teaching policy guidelines and standards. This study attempts to address the following research questions. First, what factors do low-income school actors and Argentinean educational policies highlight regarding teachers’ professional ability? Second, does a teacher’s professional ability refer to teacher leadership? Finally, what are the implications of the gap between the perspectives of low-income schools and the official teaching policy for knowledge production and educational policy? The findings provide a framework to understand the current limited status of teacher leadership in Argentina. Through the historical normalist genesis of the Argentinean educational system that fostered homogenisation as a crucial technology of schooling, and an epistemological bias that deemed the low-income perspective as unscientific the article shed light on the status of teacher leadership. Finally, the research suggests bridges to foster dialogues between teaching policies and low-income schools.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Acosta, F. (2009). Reconfiguration of the secondary school faced with massive entry of students from poor sectors. Revista de Pedagogía, 30(87), 217–246.
Aikman, S., Robinson-Pant, A., McGrath, S., Jere, C. M., Cheffy, I., Themelis, S., & Rogers, A. (2016). Challenging deficit discourses in international education and development. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 46, 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1134954
Beech, J., & Barrenechea, I. (2011). Pro-market educational governance: Is Argentina a black swan? Critical Studies in Education, 52, 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2011.604077
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46
Bruns, B., & Luque, J. (2015). Great teachers: How to raise student learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank Group.
Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00593.x
Cochran-Smith, M. (2012). A tale of two teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2012.707501
Consejo Federal de Educación (Federal Education Committee) (2007). Resolución CFE N° 24/07 [Resolution CFE No. 24/07]. https://des-tuc.infd.edu.ar/sitio/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Res.-CFE-24-07.pdf
Consejo Federal de Educación (Federal Education Committee) (2012). Resolución CFE N° 167/12 [Resolution CFE No. 167/12]. https://cedoc.infd.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/RES_CGE_16712.pdf
Cooper, K. S., Stanulis, R. N., Brondyk, S. K., Hamilton, E. R., Macaluso, M., & Meier, J. A. (2015). The teacher leadership process: Attempting change within embedded systems. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9262-4
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Commonality in teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of effective classroom learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01066.x
Consejo Federal de Educación (Federal Education Committee) (2018). Resolución CFE N 337/18 [Resolution CFE no. 337/18]. https://dges-cba.infd.edu.ar/sitio/resoluciones-del-consejo-federal-de-educacion/upload/Res_CFE_N_337-18.pdf
Dussel, I. (2001). Normalisation et professionnalisation: Deux discours antagonistes dans les réformes concernant la formation des enseignants. Revue française de pédagogie, 38(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.3406/refor.2001.1725
Feldfeber, M. (2018). Policies for teacher training and work in Argentina from the turn of the century. In R. Normand, M. Liu, L. M. Carvalho, D. A. Oliveira, & L. LeVasseur (Eds.), Education policies and the restructuring of the educational profession: Global and comparative perspectives, perspectives on rethinking and reforming education (pp. 89–103). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8279-5_7
Forde, C., & McMahon, M. (2019). The question of teacher quality. In C. Forde, & M. McMahon (Eds.), Teacher quality, professional learning and policy: Recognising, rewarding and developing teacher expertise (pp. 1–30). UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53654-9_1
Foster, R. (2005). Leadership and secondary school improvement: Case studies of tensions and possibilities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312042000299233
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gómez Caride, E. (2016). ¿Buenos profesores? La voz de los estudiantes de escuelas secundarias en contextos urbanos marginals [Good teachers? The voice of high school students in marginal urban contexts]. Revista De Investigación Latinoamericana (PEL), 53(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.53.2.2016.7
Guyatt, G., Cairns, J., Churchill, D., Cook, D., Haynes, B., Hirsh, J., Irvine, J., Levine, M., Levine, M., Nishikawa, J., Sackett, D., Brill-Edwards, P., Gerstein, H., Gibson, J.,Jaeschke, R., ..., Tugwell, P.(1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 2420–2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
Ida, Z. S. (2017). What makes a good teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050118
Jones, D. (1970). Towards a native anthropology. Human Organization, 29(4), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.29.4.717764244331m4qv
Kaplan, C. V., & di Napoli, P. (2017). Youth typifications on violence in school. Ultima Década, 25, 147–183. https://doi.org/10.4067/S071822362017000100147
Kaztman, R. (2001). Seducidos y abandonados: El aislamiento social de los pobres urbanos. Revista de la CEPAL, 75, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.18356/16a0b21c-es
Kilinç, A. Ç. (2014). Examining the relationship between teacher leadership and school climate. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilim, 14, 1729–1742. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.2159
Kriewaldt, J. A. (2015). Strengthening learners’ perspectives in professional standards to restore relationality as central to teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.5
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Liu, P., Xiu, Q., Tang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Understanding teacher leadership identity: The perspectives of Chinese high school teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2006792
Liu, Y. (2021). Contextual influence on formal and informal teacher leadership. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100028
McNess, E., Arthur, L., & Crossley, M. (2015). “Ethnographic dazzle” and the construction of the “Other”: Revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Comparative Education, 45, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
Milligan, L. (2016). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Comparative Education, 46, 235– 250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928510
Ministerio de Educación de la Nación. (2021). Anuario Estadístico de Educación 2020 [Statistical Yearbook of Education 2020]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ministerio de Educación de la Nación.
Mons, N. (2007). Les nouvelles politiques éducatives: La France fait-elle les bons choix?. Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.mons.2007.01
Nebra, M. J. (2015). “Los pibes chorros” Jóvenes en situación de vulnerabilidad penal y construcción de identidad(es): Políticas sociales y prácticas culturales de y para jóvenes en conflicto con la ley penal. Horizontes Sociológicos, 3(6), 106–118.
Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2020). A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003–2017): Evidence, patterns and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 58, 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2018-0023
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
Patience, A. (2008). The art of loving in the classroom: A defence of affective pedagogy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n2.4
Romero, C., & Krichesky, G. (2019). El director escolar en Argentina: Un actor clave pero (aún) invisible. Un estudio sobre las normas, condiciones laborales y formación de los directores escolares de escuelas públicas. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27, 12. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3576
Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. (2018). Key actors’ involvement in implementing assessment reforms and using quality improvement measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9279-3
Southwell, M. (2013). Schooling and governance: Pedagogical knowledge and bureaucratic expertise in the genesis of the Argentine Educational System. Paedagogica Historica, 49, 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2012.744063
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Quist, H. O. (2000). The politics of educational borrowing: Reopening the case of Achimota in British Ghana. Comparative Education Review, 44, 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1086/447615
Terigi, F. (2008). Los cambios en el formato de la escuela secundaria argentina: Por qué son necesarios, por qué son tan difíciles. Propuesta Educativa, 29, 63–71.
Tröhler, D. (2015). The medicalization of current educational research and its effects on education policy and school reforms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942957
Warren, C. A. (2014). Towards a pedagogy for the application of empathy in culturally diverse classrooms. Urban Review, 46, 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-013-0262-5
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87, 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255