Strategies for AI Use in Thesis Writing among Undergraduate Language Students: A Think-Aloud Protocol
Main Article Content
Abstract
Thesis writing has always been regarded as a complex process. However, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is assumed to be helpful as it would enable students to simplify the process of thesis writing. The use of AI tools in thesis writing among students is becoming more prevalent, but there is limited understanding of how these tools are being integrated into the writing process and how students balance their own involvement with AI support during the writing process. Thus, there is a need to explore the strategies students employ when interacting with AI tools, and how these strategies impact their writing process. Understanding these dynamics is essential for improving the way AI can be utilised in thesis writing. This study aims to explore areas of AI utilisation in undergraduate students’ thesis writing and the AI tools they employ, and to analyse the strategies undergraduate students employ in the thesis writing process. The study employed a qualitative approach where the primary method was a semi-structured interview. The interview included a Retrospective Think-Aloud (RTA) protocol where the participants shared their thoughts and strategies in completing the thesis. The participants were eight final-year undergraduate students majoring in Arabic and English language studies from a language faculty in a selected higher learning institution in the central region of Malaysia. Findings revealed four interconnected strategies – AI as Assistive Tool, AI as Intelligent System, AI as Cognitive and Affective Partner, and Delegated Autonomy. Mapped across the domains of AI literacy – Engaging, Creating, Managing, and Designing – these strategies represent a developmental continuum from mechanical aid to critically regulated collaboration. Among them, delegated autonomy emerged as a key theoretical contribution, describing students’ deliberate management of human–AI interdependence through ethical judgement and metacognitive control. These identified strategies could act as a framework to effectively use AI in thesis writing, contributing to the enhancement in the writing process and the development of students’ writing skills.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Barasa, D. (2024). Demystifying the discourse: Techniques to effective academic writing. Journal of Research and Academic Writing, 1(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.58721/jraw.v1i1.571
Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud analysis in qualitative research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38
Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2023). Student perceptions of AI trustworthiness and the development of critical AI literacy in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(4), 112–128.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eleftheriou, M., Ahmer, M., & Fredrick, D. (2025). Balancing ethics and support: Peer tutors’ experiences with AI tools in student writing. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep587. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16554
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2026). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(1–2), 263–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772
Johnson, M., Davies, R., & Smith, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence feedback and student reflection in academic writing: Impacts on self-regulated learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 1036–1051.
Jonathans, P. M., Cahyono, B. Y., Kweldju, S., Ratri, D. P., Astutik, I., & Syarif, T. I. S. T. (2025). Evolving self-regulation and self-efficacy in academic writing: Sojourning narratives of EFL doctoral students. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.41180
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2023). Developing AI literacy in higher education: A pedagogical framework and empirical study. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100123.
Long, D., & Cope, B. (2021). AI and the future of literacy. Common Ground Research Networks.
Mu, C. (2005). A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice Conference, Singapore, 1–10.
Ng, D. T. K., Cheung, K. F., & Chung, R. C. K. (2021). Rethinking AI literacy: A review of conceptual frameworks and pedagogical implications. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(3), 395–421.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2023). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
OECD. (2025). Empowering learners for the age of AI: An AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education (Review draft). https://ailiteracyframework.org/
Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A review of AI-powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035
Smith, L., Davies, M., & Johnson, P. (2024). Curricular interventions for fostering AI literacy among university students: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 123–145.
Sperber, L., MacArthur, M., Minnillo, S., Stillman, N., & Whithaus, C. (2025). Peer and AI Review+ Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment. Computers and Composition, 76, 102921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102921
Tuomi, I. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).
UNESCO. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Compendium of promising initiatives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.18356/d94175df-en
Wang, C. (2025). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2024). Designing an AI literacy curriculum for higher education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 201–220.